My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso # 4844
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
F
>
Fox Ridge Road
>
1850 Fox Ridge Road - 03-117-23-13-0008
>
Resolutions
>
Reso # 4844
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:33:36 PM
Creation date
3/19/2020 1:16:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1850
Street Name
Fox Ridge
Street Type
Road
Address
1850 Fox Ridge Rd
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0311723130008
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> la G~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> `�kESH0 NO. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 902-2793. <br /> 2. The property is located in the RR-113, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning <br /> District. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 17, 2002 and <br /> recommended denial by a vote of 6 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. In November,2001 the Council approved a Conditional Use Permit for land <br /> alteration on the property over 500 cubic yards. The project required clear- <br /> cutting the slope and depositing of 3,280 cubic yards of fill. The purpose was <br /> to create a gradual slope rather than the existing steep drop from the <br /> immediate back yard of the house. <br /> B. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the application to permit <br /> an after-the-fact variance and conditional use permit for land alteration within <br /> 26' of the wetland, the denial includes any alteration beyond the previously <br /> approved elevations. <br /> C. The slopes on the property did not meet the general recommendation of 3: 1. <br /> D. No recommendation was provided regarding the land alteration over the <br /> property lines and on the neighboring properties. This resulted from the <br /> information that was provided regarding the legality of the application. <br /> E. There was no clear indication that the application was legal since there was <br /> new information that had been discussed by the Planning Commission that <br /> they may have to review the issue of land alteration on adjacent properties as <br /> separate permits. No recommendation was considered that included any land <br /> alteration in regards to the adjacent properties. <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.