Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Gaffron <br /> From: Stephen Grittman [sgrittman@nacplanning.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 10:22 AM <br /> To: Mike Gaffron <br /> Subject: Comp Plan Adoption <br /> Attachments: Com Plan Draft Outline.doc <br /> Hi Mike- <br /> Attached is a very rough outline of a work program. It is rough in a couple of ways—first, it may be missing some pieces, <br /> so if you have thoughts about what might be missing, I' d appreciate the additions. Second, it is a little disjointed and <br /> non-linear as it is somewhat stream-of-consciousness, so it needs some attention to layout. i'm kind of focusing on <br /> three big issues on the land use/housing side: <br /> 1. Density/Housing Count/Affordable Housing in the MUSA <br /> 2. Hook-ups for existing unsewered units in the MUSA <br /> 3. Treatment of the Rural Residential areas at 2-5 du/acre <br /> Met Council's review letter addresses other items, but these seem to be the main general issues. Take a look at the <br /> attached material and let me know your reaction. We can figure out how to assign some hours once we have a scope <br /> that looks good. <br /> I would say that once you've arrived at the point where you're willing to accept that this has become a numbers game <br /> with Met Council, I think the scope of the issue is not as troublesome as it feels like it is. As I have been working through <br /> this and talking with some of my other staff,your unit count problem is actually going to end up being somewhere south <br /> of 300 units. Thanks—looking forward to working with you again. <br /> -sg <br /> Stephen W. Grittman <br /> Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. <br /> 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202 <br /> Golden Valley, MN 55422 <br /> 763.231 .2555 <br /> s�c rittman@nacplanning.com <br /> I I <br /> 1 <br /> ���� <br />