My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-10-2009 Council Work Session Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2009
>
11-10-2009 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 3:58:03 PM
Creation date
7/8/2015 3:57:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> MEMORANDUM 11-70-09 Work Session <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> � �. <br /> From: Mike Gaffron, Asst. City Administrator ; � � <br /> �'4 <br /> Date: November 4, 2009 <br /> Subject: Planning Commission Membership & Size <br /> Attachments: <br /> A - PC Current Tenures Table <br /> B - Draft Staff Memo 10-20-09 <br /> C - PC Application Received from Linda Fuess <br /> At the September 29 Work Session, Council indicated an interest in having staff explore the <br /> process and ramifications of reducing the Planning Commission from seven members to five <br /> members. Melanie has drafted a memo and ordinance that would revise the code to do that, and <br /> which would also remove the requirements that two members be from the Rural area, two from <br /> the Urban area, and that one reside on Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore. <br /> Before placing that in front of the Council far action, we wanted to have some discussion about <br /> the impacts of these possible changes. Consider the following: <br /> ► We have not always strictly followed the Urban/Rural/Lakeshore mix. For instance, the most <br /> recent 7-member PC has included 5 Rural (Tess, Jaye-Ann, Kim, Jon, Denise) and 2 Urban <br /> (Ralph & Loren) with Loren being the only Lakeshore owner. Council may wish to consider <br /> whether keeping this requirement in place has value. <br /> ► Currently we have 6 regular PC members, one of which (Jaye-Ann) is on a leave of absence <br /> until next May. Of these 6, only one has a term expiring soon, up far renewal in 2010 (Tess, <br /> term expires 3/31/10). Without asking the question, we assume Tess would like to be <br /> reappointed. So if we change to 5 members, would you intend to keep a 6-member <br /> commission when Jaye-Ann returns, until it reduces itself to 5 by attrition sometime in the <br /> near or far future? We assume you do not want to give anyone the boot... <br /> ► We do not suggest changing the code to designate a six-member PC, since that results in the <br /> potential for tie votes, as well as still requiring a 4-member quorum, the same as for a 7- <br /> member PC... <br /> ► In terms of functionality, a 5-member PC may ultimately be more efficient in discussions and <br /> at reaching conclusions than a 7-member PC... <br /> ► We currently have 4 designated PC alternates (Michelle Winer, Dave Rahn, Jan Berg, Sandy <br /> Smith) all of whom are former regular members. This serves us well when we need an <br /> alternate, but we don't have any future commissioners getting up-to-speed before they <br /> become regular members. We have one applicant who responded to our most recent <br /> advertisement for candidates to fill one regular position that expires 3/31/10 (Ralph's seat) <br /> and for one temporary position to fill in for Jaye-Ann until May. When would Council like <br /> to interview this candidate? <br />� lii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.