Laserfiche WebLink
473.858, 2008 Minnesota Statutes Page 1 of 2 <br /> �-- � <br /> ..r---- <br /> 2008 Minnesota Statutes <br /> 473.8�8 COMPREHENSIVE PLANS; LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS. <br /> Subdivision 1. No conflicting zoning, fiscal device, official control. Within nine <br /> months following the receipt of a metropolitan system statement for an amendment to a <br /> metropolitan system plan and within three years following the receipt of a metropolitan <br /> system statement issued in conjunction with the decennial review required under section <br /> 473.864, subdivision 2, every local governmental unit shall have reviewed and, if <br /> necessary, amended its comprehensive plan in accordance with sections 462.355, <br /> 473.175, and 473.851 to 473.871 and the applicable planning statute and shall have <br /> submitted the plan to the Metropolitan Council for review pursuant to section 473.175. <br /> The provisions of sections 462.355, 473.175, and 473.851 to 473.871 shall supersede the <br /> provisions of the applicable planning statute wherever a conflict may exist. If the <br /> coinprehensive municipal plan is in conflict with the zoning ordinance, the zoning <br /> ordinance shall be brought into conformance with the plan by local government units in <br /> conjunction with the review and, if necessary, amendment of its comprehensive lan <br /> required under section 473.864, subdivision 2. fter August 1, 1995, a local government <br /> � unit shall not a op any isca evice or official control which is in conflict with its <br /> comprehensive plan, including any amendments to the plan, or which permits activity in <br /> co ' with metropolitan system plans, as defined by section 473.852, subdivision 8. <br /> f <br /> The comprehensive plan shall provide guidelines for the timmg and sequence o t e <br /> adoption of official controls to ensure planned, orderly, and staged development and <br /> redevelopment consistent with the comprehensive plan. Far purposes of this section, a <br /> fiscal device or official control shall not be considered to be in conflict with a local <br /> government unit's comprehensive plan ar to permit an activity in conflict with <br /> metropolitan system plans if such fiscal device or official control is adopted to ensure the <br /> planned, orderly, and staged development of urbanization or redevelopment areas <br /> designated in the comprehensive plan pursuant to section 473.859, subdivision 5. <br /> Subd. 2. Adjacent review, comment. Local governmental units shall submit their <br /> proposed plans to adjacent governmental units, affected special districts lying in whole or <br /> in part within the metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment <br /> at least six months prior to submission of the plan to the council and shall submit copies <br /> to them on the submission of the plan to the council. For minor plan amendments,the <br /> council may prescribe a shorter review and comment period, or may waive the review <br /> and comment period if the minor plan amendments involve lands that are not conti�uous <br /> to other local governmental units. <br /> Subd. 3. When to council. The plans shall be submitted to the council following <br /> recommendation by the planning agency of the unit and after consideration but before <br /> final approval by the governing body of the unit. <br /> Subd. 4. Status of old, new programs, plans, controls. Comprehensive plans, <br /> capital improvement programs, sewer policy plans and official controls of local <br /> governmental units adopted prior to the requirements of sections 462.355, 473.175, and <br /> https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/statutes/?id=473.858 8/25/2009 <br />