Laserfiche WebLink
City's current zoning or planned guiding. While the household increase is nearly the <br /> same as that projected in the System Statement, the starting points are different. The Ciry <br /> shoN�s the existing number of households in the community to be about 500 units less than <br /> the System Statement forecasts for 2010. Council estimated that in April 2008, Orono had <br /> 3,002 households. (MPG Note: MC has misread Table 3B-2; it actually shows 3239 <br /> dwelling units, the equivalent of about 3,075 households at 95% occupancy, <br /> relatively near MC's 2008 estimate) <br /> The current guiding may be insufficient to accommodate the Council's forecasted growth <br /> through 2030. The Update needs to indicate how or what will be changed or reguided to <br /> accommodate the Council's forecasted growth. Tables 3B-4a and 3B-4b calculate future <br /> land use projections. These tables include existing and future households in the <br /> calculation, so it is difficult to determine whether new development will occur at densities <br /> consistent with Council policy (3 dN�elling units per net ac). Using the information <br /> provided in the Update, the overall development in the communiry (existing and future) <br /> results in a gross density of 0.8 dwelling units per acre (2,96� dwelling units on 3�78 <br /> gross acres). <br /> The Update describes the development of five different "Parcel Groups" within the <br /> community, but it appears that these areas have limited capacity to accommodate the <br /> City's forecasted growth as several of these areas have already undergone development. <br /> The land use categories used in the analysis of these groups does not match the guiding <br /> shown in Map 38-6. The Update indicates that future urban development will be carefully <br /> integrated into existing neighborhoods, but outside of the Parcel Group analysis, the <br /> Update does not indicate where future urban development will occur and at what <br /> densities it will occur. Council staff would like to meet with the City staff Co go over the <br /> land use questions. � <br /> POLICY ISSUES <br /> Urban Densitv <br /> The Update contains policies that are inconsistent with the 2030 Regional Development <br /> Framewof�k (RDF). In its description of u��ban and rural areas of the community, the <br /> Update indicates that development in the urban area "will remain relatively low (ranging <br /> from 1 unit per ac�°e to as much as 4-6 units per acre, with a few individual multi family <br /> sites as high as 1� units per acre)" (p. 3B-10). As described above, the Update does not <br /> provide sufficient information to assess whether new development and redevelopment will <br /> occur at densities consistent with Council policy,for sanita�y sewer serviced areas. In <br /> addition, because the Update has a stated policy of not expanding the MLISA, it is unclear <br /> how and where the Ciry will accommodate new sewef•ed development and/or <br /> redevelopment. <br /> The policy descs�ibed above and text elsewhere in the Update indicate that it may be <br /> unlikely that overall new development receiving sanitary sewer would achieve an overall <br /> net density of at least three units per acre (Text on page 38-13, Policy # 1 on page 3B-19, <br /> Policy #12 on page 3B-23). The City is advised of the Council's Revised Met�°opolitan <br /> Urban Service A�-ea Implementation Guidelines <br /> (http://www.mnetr�ocouncil.org/planning/assistance/MZISAChangeGuidelines.pdfl, which <br /> indicate the conditions under which properties may be connected to regional wastewater <br /> services as well as the Council's method fo� calculating residential development net <br /> density. <br /> Review of Met Council Comp Plan/nitial Response Page 8 of 17 <br /> August 28, 2009 <br />