My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
03-16-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2020 2:20:04 PM
Creation date
3/17/2020 1:57:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Tuesday,February 18,2020 <br /> 6:00 p.m. <br /> Libby asked Staff if, as previously approved,the deck had been completely removed,as indicated in the <br /> plan,would it have met the hardcover and the setback so the Commission would not be dealing with a <br /> variance at this point. <br /> Curtis said the Commission would still be dealing with the boathouse expansion. <br /> Libby stated there would still be a third element they would have to deal with even if the dock/deck were <br /> removed. <br /> Curtis said if the deck had been eliminated,they would still be talking about the boathouse expansions. <br /> Ressler asked if there is anyone that does not agree that the Commission should keep structure no further <br /> lakeward. In other words,the Commission should keep structure where it was on the application. <br /> Thiesse indicated Erickson was willing to accept it where it is. <br /> Erickson said he is comfortable with the gables and the entryway decorative pillars. <br /> Barnhart indicated it was not necessary to consolidate the comments for the applicant and that the <br /> applicant can take or ignore anything stated. He indicated it would be appropriate to call for the vote and <br /> move forward. <br /> Ressler indicated it is helpful for the Commission to understand how people feel. <br /> Barnhart stated Staff would do that in their memo. <br /> Gettman moved,Bollis seconded,to recommend denial of Application No. LA20-000005 Gordon <br /> James Construction,2665 Casco Point Road,After-the-Fact Variances. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 1 <br /> (Erickson). <br /> 4. LA20-000007 REVISION LLC, 1030 TONKAWA ROAD, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,6:46 <br /> P.M.—6:54 P.M. <br /> John Daly,Applicant,was present. <br /> Staff presented a summary of packet information. <br /> Libby asked for clarification of the portion of the covenant that has to do with rental. <br /> Curtis stated that it is prohibited. <br /> Libby asked if rental would still be prohibited if there was a permitted license. <br /> Curtis stated that this was correct. <br /> Ressler asked if Community Developer Director Barnhart had any input. <br /> Page 6 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.