My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-14-2009 Council Work Session Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1999-2016 work sessions
>
2009
>
07-14-2009 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 3:06:33 PM
Creation date
7/8/2015 3:06:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3im Zimmerman <br /> Au�ust 9. ?000 <br /> PaQe J <br /> �. Based on staff ineasurements tius vear, none of th: docks subject to an <br /> existing CUP have been extended past the len�ths allowed b�� the CUP. <br /> Docl�in� of boats that are lonaer than tne docks is not specificall�� re�ulated <br /> in the City code nor in the existin� CUP's. <br /> C. Issues Citv V�%ill Address. <br /> 1. We believe that the Ci��can address IightinQ issues throu�h the ZoninQ Code. <br /> The Cit��can require the shieldinQ or the source of Iiahtin�(the bulbs)so that <br /> it is not visible from adjoining propenies. This is normally enforced by the <br /> Zoning Department. You or the neiQhborhood will have to advise us of any <br /> specific Iighting issues before we will take action. Generally, City staff <br /> supports the idea of security Iightin� for these docks as a deterrent to theft <br /> and vandalism, which can spill over into the neiahborhood. <br /> ?. Noise issues with the use of securin� alarms, loud music, etc. can be dealt <br /> with via the noise ordinance which is enforced by the Police Department. <br /> Faise alarms would be dealt w�ith in the normal manner bv the Police <br /> Department. Cit�� staff supports the use of securit�� systems and alarms as a <br /> deterrent to crime. <br /> �. The�issue of the driveway hardcover wit'tun 7�' of the lake is a zoning matter <br /> which the Zonin� Department is pursuin�. V�rnile the placement of a.avel <br /> does not require a buildinQ permit, the location in which it was placed is not <br /> leval aiven that it is considered �s hardcover when used as a parkin� area. <br /> The Cit��has asked Ginther and Ault to remove the hardcover parkin� area. <br /> Their response is that they wi11 request a variance for the parl;ina area <br /> hardcover because the Cit�� has eliminated their street parl:inQ. <br /> 4. The Police Department has ad��ised that pari:in� on pri��ate propert�� is onl�� <br /> required to be 3' from a fire h��drant;the no�nal 10'parlcin�separation is not <br /> enforceable on pri��ate prope����. <br /> D. Other Issues. <br /> 1. I am advised by the LMCD that there ma�� be issues with certain Nano��c <br /> docl:s in relation to the dock use areas aefined b�� e�tended lot lines. This is <br /> a separate matter that would have to be addressed tnrouah the LMCD. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.