My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-2009 Council Work Session Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1999-2016 work sessions
>
2009
>
04-14-2009 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 2:43:40 PM
Creation date
7/8/2015 2:55:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, , I <br /> � � <br /> April 13, 2009 <br /> Memo to: City Council <br /> From: Lyle Oman, Building Official ��� <br /> Re: Hazardous building action <br /> On March 18th, 2009 I received a call from Tom Hagadorn who owns a property at 3443 Crystal <br /> Place in Orono. He purchased the property in January of 2006 with the intent of remodeling it for <br /> resale. After he gutted the lower level he found out the foundation is severely deteriorated and <br /> in danger of collapse. He would now like to remove the house and garage and market the the <br /> vacant lot. However because of the economy he cannot afford the demolition. We discussed <br /> Hazardous building action and I informed him of MN Statute 463.151(attached). This statute <br /> allows municipalities to remove or raze hazardous buildings with the�roperty owners consent. <br /> The cost would then be certified against the property taxes except that the city may provide that <br /> cost so assessed may be paid in not to exceed five equal annual installments with interest <br /> thereon, at eight percent per annum. <br /> After discussion with staff and Soren Mattick City attorney, I find no down side to this course of <br /> action. The following is several scenarios. <br /> 1. We remove the buildings and he pays of the cost plus interest for 5 years. <br /> 2. We remove the buildings and he sells the property. The outstanding assessment gets <br /> paid at closing. <br /> 3. We remove the buildings, he does not sell the lot and it goes tax forfeit. The county <br /> would eventually sell the lot and we get paid at closing. <br /> This building was a commercial building in its past and is located up against the street property <br /> line and is an eye sore. I solicited three bids all in the $10,000 range. The bids include removal <br /> of the house and garage, disconnection of the sewer and water, grading the lot to partially fill the <br /> excavation, erosion control, top soil and seeding. <br /> I am seeking your input and approval for moving forward on this project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.