My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-24-2009 Council Work Session Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2009
>
03-24-2009 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 2:52:23 PM
Creation date
7/8/2015 2:52:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Views were also categorized as positive and negative in the study. Because the purpose was to <br /> identify components of rural character, rural and historical uses were given a positive <br /> connotation. This is summarized as follows: <br /> Positive views: Views of natural areas, water bodies, established <br /> parks, wetlands, rural land uses. <br /> Negative views: Views of structures, particularly residential, <br /> institutional, and commercial and industrial uses. <br /> Case Study #I: County Road 6 West- Open Enclosure Corridor <br /> County Road 6 West (CR6), between Brown Road and Highway 12, was chosen as a study <br /> corridor with predominantly open enclosure (See CPA Figure 1, Corridor B). The graphic and <br /> images on CPA Figure 2 show both the character of the corridor and the consultants' assessment <br /> of its attributes. <br /> The corridor analysis of CR6 revealed that because open enclosure provides long views beyond <br /> the right-of-way, the rural feel of an open enclosure is tied to views of natural landscapes and <br /> amenities. Examples of these types of views along CR6 include views of Baker Park Natural <br /> Area and a hilly pasture, both along the north side of the road. From the analysis of the CR6 <br /> corridor and other corridors in the Corridor Study, it can be concluded that threats to this type of <br /> rural character along corridors with open enclosure include views of"non-rural" land uses such <br /> as new residential and industrial structures. Examples of these threats in the CR6 corridor <br /> include views of unscreened residential areas south of the road, between Old Crystal Bay Road <br /> . and Brown Road North. Another threat to rural character in open enclosure corridors is the <br /> degradation of natural viewsheds. As development occurs, views of natural areas can be <br /> obstructed or altered, as can the quality of the natural area itsel£ Considering this threat, one <br /> area of concern in the CR6 corridor would be the views and quality of Lake Classen, across <br /> CR6 from Baker Park. <br /> While analyzing open enclosure corridors for the Corridor Study, it was determined that threats <br /> to rural character in the face of development can be remedied by specific ecological and <br /> development measures. One measure is the screening of non-rural uses to avoid negative views, <br /> which can be done with berming, landscaping, and planting techniques. Zoning standards can be <br /> implemented to ensure the use of these techniques in new development, as well as promoting <br /> development patterns that are complimentary to the maintenance of desired corridor character. <br /> The preservation and enhancement of natural viewsheds can also be implemented to mitigate the <br /> degradation of viewsheds such as Lake Classen. <br /> Case Study #2: Watertown Road-Edged Enclosure Corridor <br /> Between Willow Drive and the city's western boundary, Watertown Road is an example of an <br /> edged enclosure (See CPA Figure 1, Corridor E). The graphic and images on CPA Figure 3 <br /> show both the character of the corridor and the consultants' assessment of its attributes. <br /> City of Orono DSU, Inc <br /> Draft CPA 9 August, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.