Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,July 14,2014 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (7. #14-3674 LORI GHER <br /> ARDI ON BEHALF OF WOLVER TON PI,ACE,LLC—4570 <br /> WOLVE ONPLACE—CONSERVATION EASEMENT VACATIONontinued) <br /> Curtis indicated sh ould forward the draft resolution to Mr. Stephenson so he can review it prior to the <br /> next City Council mee <br /> Gaffron stated he would also beh4Tpy to sit down with the applicant and work through the numbers. <br /> Printup asked if he is okay with the vacation request. <br /> Stephenson stated he is and that he just has a pro em with the fee reimbursement. <br /> Mattick stated the approval of the-vacation should be 6i tioned upon the fee reimbursement. <br /> Levang moved,Anderson seconded,Application No. 14-3 6i�Iqori Gherardi on behalf of Waterton <br /> Place,LLC,4570 Wolverton Place,to direct Staff to draft a reso on approving the vacation of <br /> the conservation easement located at 4570 Wolverton Place,subject t 4,820 being reimbursed to <br /> the City. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> 8. JOSEPH CHURCH—4440 FOREST LAKE LANDING—ENCROACHMENT <br /> AGREEMENT <br /> Curtis stated the applicant approached the City in June of 2013 with a request for permission to conduct <br /> some maintenance improvements and minor changes to the driveway and sidewalk access to his property <br /> which are located entirely within the City right-of-way. At that time the applicant was requesting <br /> approval to expand the driveway and reconstruct the stairs and sidewalk that access the home. The <br /> applicant indicated that he would be agreeable to the future removal of the deck/patio and also entering <br /> into an encroachment agreement. The apoljnt was instructed to provide a plan for the desired <br /> improvements. <br /> Curtis stated since that time,the applicant has provided a survey for the property and has revised his <br /> request. At the present time the applicant isnot requesting approval for any expansion of hardcover but is <br /> proposing to rebuild the stairs and sidewalk and driveway in the same footprint as existing. In addition, <br /> he intends to re-grade the side yard so that the retaining walls on the east side of the driveway can be <br /> removed. The lower grading would allow for two vehicles to park in the driveway and accommodate the <br /> vehicle doors opening without actually enlarging the driveway footprint. The driveway would be <br /> replaced in-kind. <br /> Curtis noted the stairs, deck and retaining walls under the deck would remain at this time. The applicant <br /> is amenable to re-evaluation and removal of the deck at a later date. However,the driveway and sidewalk <br /> projects have a higher priority as the failing driveway, sidewalk and stairs are causing water to enter the <br /> home. <br /> Curtis noted that Planning Staff and the City's Consulting Engineer, Brian Simmons,have visited the site <br /> to review the proposed work. Technically a permit does not apply as the work will be conducted within <br /> the City right-of-way,but an encroachment agreement, erosion control escrow and plan will be required. <br /> Page 14 of 19 <br />