My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Request for Council Action 2014
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
F
>
Forest Lake Landing
>
4440 Forest Lake Landing - 07-117-23-24-0017
>
Misc
>
Request for Council Action 2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:32:59 PM
Creation date
3/16/2020 3:12:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
4440
Street Name
Forest Lake
Street Type
Landing
Address
4440 Forest Lake Landing
Document Type
Misc
PIN
0711723240017
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 24,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (9. 4440 FOREST LAKE LANDING—ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT, Continued) <br /> Bremer stated she would be amenable to cleaning up and improving the access point to the garage as well <br /> as the stairs provided that the Council does not feel the problem is being made worse. Bremer stated she <br /> does not want the solution to be worse than what the problem was. Bremer commented the deck will not <br /> be there forever since its useful life will eventually come to an end. <br /> Levang stated she would like to see as many encroachments go away as possible since it is a fire lane and <br /> should be marked as a fire lane. Levang stated she would like the public to be able to use the fire lane and <br /> that she is in favor of removing as many of the encroachments as possible. <br /> Mattick asked if the Council would like to see the applicant's plans first or whether Staff should draft an <br /> encroachment agreement that requires the removal of the deck. Typically an encroachment agreement <br /> would specify what is allowed to remain in the fire lane and that it would likely be the driveway and the <br /> steps at this point. <br /> Levang commented it seems like the Council is flying half-blind in this situation since there is not a <br /> formal plan being proposed. <br /> Mattick stated it is not uncommon to do an encroachment agreement that says the property owner has <br /> already installed these items and then those items are described and allowed to remain until the City <br /> determines they have to be removed. <br /> Church noted the adjacent land to the south is a very steep incline and that they share responsibility with <br /> the neighbor to mow and maintain that area. Church indicated he has a concern that if there is an <br /> elevation change,the well will be exposed. Church stated they have a difficult time mowing that area <br /> now and that he is not sure how to do an elevation change without exposing the well and requiring a <br /> retaining wall. <br /> Anderson stated that is one of the reasons why the Council needs more information at this time. <br /> Curtis displayed a picture of the area and noted it is not a good picture of the angle. <br /> Church indicated he is not sure when that was graded that way. <br /> McMillan asked if someone would need to walk through the landscaping to access the lake. <br /> Church stated they would not since there is a small grassy area they can walk through but that the terrain <br /> is somewhat steep down to the lake. <br /> Levang asked who owns that strip of land. <br /> Curtis indicated the City owns that. <br /> Mattick commented it is hard to visualize but all of the paver is within the City's right-of-way. <br /> Printup stated the question in his mind is whether the patio and deck should go away and relocated within <br /> the property lines. Printup asked whether that would impact the hardcover. <br /> Page 12 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.