Laserfiche WebLink
Council <br /> Exhibit H <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 24,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 9. 4440 FOREST LAKE LANDING—ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT <br /> Struve stated the City has been requested by the owner of 4440 Forest Lake Landing for approval to <br /> widen his driveway,which would have an additional impact to the right-of-way in that area. Under the <br /> City's Community Management Plan,the City has a responsibility to retain Lake Minnetonka access <br /> points permanently for the public's use. By allowing a deck and patio within the right-of-way, it gives <br /> the perception this area is private land. <br /> Struve stated in the past, when a property undergoes major changes and upgrades, Staff will recommend <br /> all impacts within the right-of-way be removed. There will be times when not all of the impacts can be <br /> feasibly removed,but any impacts which cannot be feasibly removed will be included in an encroachment <br /> agreement. The encroachment agreement would allow the City to require the property owner to remove <br /> the encroachments if the encroachments become an issue in the future. <br /> In an effort to clean up the City's right-of-way, Staff is agreeable to allowing the widened driveway and <br /> repairs to the sidewalk conditioned on the property owner removing the deck and patio area within the <br /> right-of-way. The property owner should be required to enter into an encroachment agreement addressing <br /> all other items located within the City right-of-way. Staff recommends they remove the deck and patio <br /> and determine if it is possible to realign the door so the steps can also be removed. All other items would <br /> be allowed to remain in place but should be incorporated into an encroachment agreement. <br /> McMillan asked if the new hardcover for the driveway would be included in the overall hardcover for the <br /> property. <br /> Curtis stated the hardcover in the right-of-way would be separated out. <br /> McMillan asked if a new survey would be required. <br /> Struve indicated they have not seen a building permit request at the present time. <br /> Curtis stated the property owner has not submitted a plan or requested a building permit but is merely <br /> requesting preapproval of the work. The project would also require the moving of some retaining walls. <br /> Struve stated there are numerous encroachments in the right-of-way and the question is what items should <br /> be removed out of the right-of-way. <br /> Levang asked if there will be a formal request for a building permit; and if so, if Staff has any idea when <br /> that might be submitted. <br /> Struve indicated the applicant is in the audience and he would be able to address those questions. <br /> Levang asked if Staff would like the encroachment cleaned up prior to the application. <br /> Struve stated the applicant requested to widen the driveway; and if that request is denied,that would <br /> change what he wants to do with the property and a survey may or may not be required at that point. The <br /> property owner is attempting to save some money by not doing the survey at this point until he gets some <br /> idea of what the Council will approve. <br /> Page 9 of 15 <br />