Laserfiche WebLink
/, , f <br /> the general latitude of the Twin Cities) according to the 1987 Manual (Table 5 pg. 36), the area <br /> may be wetland but usually is not. However, the standard practice of the St. Paul COE is to <br /> declare any areas that exceed the 5 percent criteria to be judged jurisdictional wetlands. Areas <br /> with water levels within 12" of the surface in excess of 12.5 percent of the growing season are <br /> wetlands. <br /> No one has ever undertaken a scienti�c study to evaluate the relationship between the <br /> hydrological requirements and the presence of various wetland or non-wetland plant species. <br /> This is a critical, yet unanswered question. Some studies have been completed examining soil <br /> types and hydrological responsiveness but the link between plants and hydrology has yet to be <br /> made. Given the annual cost of jurisdictional decisions in terms of "lost land" opportunities, <br /> perhaps such a study would be prudent. <br /> The implications of regulatory misinterpretation are enormous in that it is likely that hundreds of <br /> acres of Type 1 wetlands are avoided or mitigated for each year when legitimately these areas are <br /> non-jurisdictional and could be developed. <br /> Avoidance or impact and mitigation can cost developers and ultimately, homebuyers, millions of <br /> dollars annually just in the developing seven-county Metropolitan Area. Mitigating a non- <br /> jurisdictional Type 1 wetland impact at a 2:1 ratio reduces the usable land base unnecessarily. <br /> For every 50 acres of non jurisdictional impact, 100 acres are removed from the land supply. At <br /> an average cost of $100,000 per acre, the cost to developers and ultimately to homeowners is <br /> $10,000,000 in just one year for just 50 acres. <br /> Type 2/3 <br /> Type 3 wetlands create the greatest classification difficulty from the perspective of de minimus <br /> qualification. �A Type 3 wetland that is seasonally flooded (C) is typically characterized by reed <br /> canary grass whereas a Type 3 semi-permanently flooded wetland is more likely characterized <br /> by a growth of cattails. The reed canary wetlands are generally dry by late spring to early <br /> summer. By late summer, the water tables have receded to well below the surface (> 18 — 36"). <br /> In contrast, Type 3 cattail wetlands still contain water above or very near the surface during <br /> normal growing seasons. <br /> The WCA permits the use of de minimus filling of Types l, 2, 6 and 7 wetlands. Clearly it is not <br /> the intent of the WCA to allow the application of the de minimus criteria to fens since the WCA <br /> specifically addresses fens as a special category for protection. Therefore, the Type 2 designation <br /> must apply to the "C": modifier Type 3 wetland. Further, Type 3 wetlands in excess of 2.5 acres <br /> in incorporated areas and in excess of 10 acres in unincorporated areas are protected under the <br /> DNR protected waters statute. In the DNR wetland inventory and classification process, the Type <br /> 3 wetlands were clearly dominated by cattails hence the inference that reed canary grass <br /> wetlands were Type 2. <br /> Type 7/Type 1L <br /> Inconsistencies in technical descriptions regarding the hydrological regime of these two wetland <br />