Laserfiche WebLink
. , <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR MAY 17, 1999 <br /> #2492 RICK AND GAIL LUZAICH, CONTINUED <br /> Phil Reznick,Attorney-at-Law,was preseni. <br /> Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting variance and conditional use permit approvals for <br /> lakeshore land alteration, including grading and construction of retaining walls within 75' of the <br /> lakeshore and within a bluff impact zone; and further request an after-the-fact approval, including <br /> approval of a restoration plan, for intensive vegetative removal within 75 feet of the shoreline and <br /> within a bluff impact zone. No restoration at this time has been completed. , <br /> i <br /> Weinberger noted that the members of the Planning Commission have had an opportunity to <br /> look at the property. Staff has concerns regarding the removal of the trees within 75 feet of the <br /> shoreline due to possible erosion into the lake. � <br /> The Applicant is proposing to construct a four foot retaining wall to extend along the slope. Staff <br /> has issues regarding the proposed landscaping plan as it does not contain any provisions for ! <br /> replacement of the trees that have been removed. Staff is requesting that reforestation be required � <br /> as part of this application. Wally Case, Landscape Architect, has had an opportunity to review <br /> the landscaping plan and is recommending that this property be reviewed by a forester to determine <br /> what trees would be best for this type of soil. I � <br /> ; � <br /> City Staff is recommending denial of the proposed landscape plan and requests that the Applicant � <br /> submit revised plans. Currently the stumps have not been removed. Staff would also like to have ' <br /> the opportunity to review this application over time to insure that proper restoration of this area is � <br /> achieved with similar trees. <br /> i <br /> Reznick inquired whether the City was requiring a replanting of mature trees approximately the i <br /> same size removed or if the Applicant could replace this type of trees with a smaller size tree. ! <br /> Weinberger stated that the City is requesting that the Applicant replace the trees with fairly mature <br /> trees, noting that it is not possible to replace some of the larger trees. <br /> Reznick expressed a concern regarding the cost of replacing the trees and suggested that the City <br /> look at what is right for the property rather than punishing the property owners. Reznick noted that <br /> the Applicant has been charged with a misdemeanor. The Applicants are willing to cooperate with '`I <br /> the City to accomplish the restoration, but they would like to keep this property in line with the <br /> other su�rounding properties. , <br /> Reznick presented photographs to the Planning Commission and noted that the other properties � <br /> do not have the lake hidden from their view. Reznick requested that the Planning Commission ,; <br /> address the house plan, noting that the Applicants would like to start work on this property in the ';I, <br /> near future. Reznick indicated that they would like to remove the stumps and replace with some <br /> shrubbing, and expressed a concern that the equipment that would be needed to replace the <br /> trees could cause the soil to be disturbed further. <br /> Hawn indicated that she would like to see this property restored as quickly as possible to prevent <br /> erosion. Hawn noted that the City has allowed rift-raft in cases where erosion has occurred, but <br /> that the retaining walls are probably not going to be looked upon favorably by the Planning <br /> Commission. Hawn stated that the Applicants will need to get together with the City foresters to <br /> determine what is most feasible for this property. <br /> Luzaich stated that he is fine with restoring the property, noting that he has spent money trimming <br /> and pruning the other trees on his property and had merely removed what he thought was old <br /> Page 8 <br />