Laserfiche WebLink
:.a'r r a <br /> eek^)x. r <br /> i <br /> C7). i "✓ <br /> Sa , •. <br /> TO: Planning Commission Council p -?' <br /> I.or FROM: A. P. Olson, Asst. Inning Administrator <br /> . DANT:: June 15, 1977 <br /> SUBJECT: Robert F. White - 320 Woodhill Road <br /> Subdivision (Preliminary) i <br /> i <br /> Applicant is requesting division of his existing 5 acre tract into two lots; <br /> the one with the existing house to have 2.7 acres, the one with a proposed i <br /> ,, ,,house to have 2.3 acres, all dry. The division line is located where shown <br /> =\ +due to the sharp hill crest at this location. The proposed lot would exceed <br /> x:200 ft. in width, but is only 140 ft. deep at the proposed house location. r <br /> a of this, the applicant is also requesting a 20 ft. rear yard setback <br /> ` `� - SO ft. to 30 ft.) for the proposed house. The rear yard abutts <br /> 0. ,„i , ' s• .try Club property. No other structures are nearby. <br /> ' k ,s+• our. -''�i Y 1 ' ' +.,, •y ! <br /> Ya <br /> t <br /> 1;` °„ .. , * ' . 'design has been submitted and sent to the City 'Engineer for <br /> 1. .' reviesi; division would be subject to the standard Park Dedication Fee 1 <br /> ''''', tajladshouldi include requirements for the private easement. <br /> A public hearing has been scheduled for July 5,-,1977, at 7:30 p.m. <br /> PLANNING CQNISSION MEETING - July 5, 1977 ; <br /> i <br /> a!# ' p�niog Ca■nssion received copy of a gineer's review and approval. On the <br /> ` ;<srrbdivision, the only concern was the access problems on Woodhill Road. <br /> planing Commission wanted to ensure that access would always be over theJ, <br /> V <br /> existing driveway andi that no new access would be developed. 41 <br /> ,,- <br /> - isco■�■eeded approval of the subdivision subject to aaintaini g the existing <br /> -;"-,,access, to providing private easements for the access drive to ea h lot, aid <br /> l' ._ park dedication feepaid. �. <br /> �.a being P <br /> v <br /> the variance, there were questions about future �p�eut on the golf 's <br /> - and that no reason could be forst too require the setback variance. . <br /> ,---course property <br /> '; Vbriatice tabled for more information. <br /> *'' 'CJCILI4scri IG • July 11, 1977at subject to slight revision. Final plat should indicateApproved prelnmiasry pa a of eliainating any accessx � egress eaaeaeat as separate outlot for tlu purpos 116111,1 <br /> a <br /> emblems in the future. <br /> :+ Zoning Administrator that Planning Coraaission had not <br /> Council was informed by talion. Flatter would be up ' " <br /> acted on variance request due to lack of representation. <br /> for Planning Comisaion review at ft:3 acrdnled meeting. ,, <br /> ' PLANNING i'QSSION • July 18, 1977 <br /> N t <br /> Setback variance denied. <br /> No representative present. No hardship demonstrated. 1 <br /> Preliminary plat previously approved. 1 <br /> k " <br /> Ali <br /> A <br /> 1 <br /> d <br />