Laserfiche WebLink
To: Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth <br /> From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br /> Date: Ju , 1987 <br /> Subject- #1163 cDowell/Woodhill - Septic Testing Review <br /> I have reviewed the site evaluation information submitted and would <br /> make the following comments: <br /> 1. Each proposed lot contains both a primary and alternate drainfield <br /> site. Three of the five lots have sites suitable for trench <br /> drainfield systems. Lots 2 and 3 will require mound systems. <br /> 2. In every case, the two sites tested are probably the only feasible <br /> sites for on-site sewage systems. This is especially true on Lots 2, <br /> 3, and 4, which all contain steep slopes, wetlands, and a single <br /> relatively level area where the systems must go. Lots 1 and 5 have a <br /> slight bit of leeway in that sites could shift slightly to allow for <br /> alternate house sites. <br /> 3. In every case, we would want to have the septic sites fenced off prior <br /> to issuance of building permits, since if the sites are disturbed, the <br /> lots would become unbuildable. <br /> A review of each lot follows: <br /> Lot 1 - Both sites suitable for trenches, on the crest of a long <br /> hill. House site is west of the septic sites. The house site will be <br /> limited by the setbacks from front and right (south) side, but is feasible. <br /> System will undoubtedly require a pump. <br /> Lot 2 - The sites are both suitable only for mounds and are located at <br /> the easterly corner of the lot. These sites are the only sites available on <br /> the lot. The anticipated house site is downhill from the mound site. <br /> Lot 3 - The mound sites are across a minor ravine from the anticipated <br /> house site. No other septic sites are feasible. The alternate mound site <br /> is about 40' from a low area we will be designating as a wetland, however, <br /> the alternate mound will be vertically about 10' above that area, hence we <br /> have no problem recommending approval of this site given that this is <br /> essentially a closed basin. <br /> PIE Lot 4 - Trench systesms could be installed on and just west of the <br /> "saddle" area, with the house site further north. Note that 50' front and <br /> rear setbacks will force the house to be wider and may tend to force <br /> encroachment on drainfield sites - I would suggest a 30' rear setback be <br /> allowed if possible. <br /> Lot 5 - Trench sites are along the top of the long hill. The house <br /> site is at the east end of that hill. There might be some potential to <br /> "flip-flop" the house and drainfeld sites, but the house site has not been <br /> tested for septic. Everything downhill is steep or is low and wet. With <br /> driveway proposed from the east end, an easterly walkout is anticipated. <br />