Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#LA20-000001 <br /> February 18,2020 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> consistent with approved concept plan? <br /> 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation <br /> The final plans as submitted are generally consistent with the previously reviewed resolution <br /> documents. The final plans should reflect city and engineer comments included in Exhibits F and <br /> G prior to placement on the City Council agenda for final review and approval. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the master development plan subject to those comments. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Application <br /> Exhibit B. Architectural Plans <br /> 1. Entrance Roof revision <br /> Exhibit C. Civil Plans <br /> Exhibit D. Landscape Plan <br /> Exhibit E. Resolution 6869 <br /> Exhibit F. Comment Letter dated 2-3-20 <br /> Exhibit G. Engineering review <br /> Exhibit H. Condition Summary <br /> Exhibit I. MCWD approval <br /> Exhibit J. SAC determination <br /> Exhibit K Mailing information <br /> References <br /> RPUD standards <br /> File 18-000036(original case file) <br />