Laserfiche WebLink
ickOivp CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> NO. 7072 <br /> -,kES H O <br /> 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: <br /> a. 75-foot Lake Setback Variance <br /> b. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br /> 6. In considering this application for the variances, the Council has considered the advice <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed <br /> variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br /> traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on <br /> values of property in the surrounding area. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br /> and intent of the ordinance . . . ."The variances support the minimal expansion of a non- <br /> conforming structure in the lake yard. Lake yard construction prohibitions are intended to <br /> maintain the natural lakeshore and encourage development away from the lake. <br /> Alternatively, the goals of average lakeshore setback include protecting views from land <br /> into the lake, the requested variances to increase the height of the existing structure the <br /> minimum amount necessary to meet the ceiling height and floodplain regulations is in <br /> harmony with the Ordinance. The most adjacent neighbors are separated from the <br /> structure and situated so that their lake views will not be impacted by the changes to the <br /> existing building. The minimal additional mass of the flat roof areas within the setbacks <br /> will not be closer to the lake than existing and will not negatively impact the views into the <br /> Property from the lake. This criterion is met. <br /> 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the <br /> comprehensive plan." The variances resulting in reconstruction of the existing sauna <br /> building without footprint expansions within the setbacks in a residential zone are <br /> consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance to permit the upward volume <br /> expansion is solely to conform to the floodplain regulations. This criterion is met. <br /> 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br /> practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. 'Practical difficulties,' as used in <br /> connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br /> a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br /> however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br /> The request to permit a minor upward expansion of the building lakeward of the <br /> average lakeshore setback and within the 75-foot lake setback appear to be <br /> reasonable; the flat roof design minimized any potential negative impacts; the <br /> 3 <br />