Laserfiche WebLink
RVC Homes <br /> Project BABX-01-0124 <br /> April 12, 2001 <br /> Page 5 • <br /> C.4. Pile Foundations <br /> We have reviewed several pipe pile sizes that are commonly used to provide the recommended pile <br /> capacities in soil conditions similar to this project. Other suitable pile types may also be available and <br /> pile-driving contractors often offer alternate pile as part of their bid. If an alternate pile type is <br /> proposed, we would be pleased to provide our analysis and opinion as to the suitability of the alternate <br /> pile for the project. We chose two commonly used pipe sizes for our analysis,they are 12 3-4-inch OD <br /> and 9 5/8-inch OD pipe. These pile sizes also correspond to those offered by Atlas Foundation <br /> Company. <br /> C.4.a. Allowable Positive Geotechnical Capacities. Allowable positive geotechnical pile capacities <br /> are determined by dividing the ultimate positive geotechnical pile capacities by a factor of safety. The <br /> American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) recommend the <br /> safety factor be related to the degree of construction control. A listing of the factors of safety is <br /> provided in Table 1. <br /> Table 1. Recommended Factors of Safety <br /> Specified Construction Control Factor of Safety <br /> Dynamic formula 3.50 <br /> Wave equation(computer analysis with hammer and driving data) • 2.75 <br /> Wave equation and Pile Dynamic Analyzer(PDA) 2.25 <br /> Static load test and dynamic formula, wave equation and/or PDA 2.00 <br /> Wave equation. PDA and static load test 1.90 <br /> Based on Table 4.5.6.2A of AASHTO's Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 1996 <br /> C.4.b. Ultimate Positive Geotechnical Capacities. We used a combination of methods including <br /> DRIVEN to predict the ultimate positive geotechnical vertical static capacities of piles. DRIVEN is a <br /> computer program developed for the Federal Highway Administration. <br /> We assumed the pile cut-off elevations will be approximately 4 feet below the lowest level slab <br /> elevation; i.e., we assumed the cutoff elevations will be about 929. We also assume a static pile load <br /> test would not be economically feasible for a project of this size, therefore pile lengths given assume the <br /> AASHTO recommended safety factor would be 2.25 when using the wave equation analysis and <br /> dynamic pile testing to judge pile capacity. <br />