My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991 original Platting title opinion
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Wildhurst Trail
>
1074 Wildhurst Tr - 07-117-23-24-0046
>
Correspondence
>
1991 original Platting title opinion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/6/2020 11:20:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1074
Street Name
Wildhurst
Street Type
Trail
Address
1074 Wildhurst Tr
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0711723240046
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 . Mechanics ' Lien rights, if any, for recent improvements <br /> on the premises or property connected therewith. <br /> 9 . Any matter which may be ascertained by survey or by an <br /> actual physical inspection of the premises. <br /> With respect to items numbered 7 and 5 c and f, I would suggest <br /> that you satisfy yourself completely prior to closing that no one <br /> is in possession of the premises other than the above-named fee <br /> owners. In Minnesota if we take title from the record owners, <br /> and someone other than the record owners are in possession, we <br /> take notice with any possible claims those parties in possession <br /> might make. It is up to you to receive satisfactory evidence <br /> from anybody in possession other than the fee owners that they <br /> make no claim to title inconsistent with the title you are <br /> purchasing. <br /> With respect to items numbered 8 and 5 a, I would suggest that <br /> you satisfy yourself completely by a visual inspection prior to <br /> closing that there have been no recent improvements made to the <br /> premises. If there have been, the property could be liened by <br /> contractors or suppliers of material who have not been paid. The <br /> lien is effective for 120 days from the date of the last item of <br /> work performed by the contractor. Any new work you find or are <br /> told about should prompt you to find adequate evidence that said <br /> improvement has been paid for in full . At the closing you will <br /> receive from the sellers an Affidavit stating that there is no <br /> work for which they have not made payment; you are entitled to <br /> rely upon the Affidavit, but I would also suggest that you make <br /> the close inspection as herein described. <br /> With respect to item numbered 9 above, I would suggest that you <br /> satisfy yourself completely prior to closing that all your <br /> improvements lie well within your boundary lines and do not <br /> encroach upon other adjoining property, and that all improvements <br /> on adjoining property lie well within their boundary lines, and <br /> do not encroach upon yours. If the closing takes place and <br /> encroachments are found, the net effect is costly litigation to <br /> have them removed. <br /> If you have any questions regarding the above, do not hesitate to <br /> give me a call . <br /> Very truly yours, <br /> LISZT LAW OFFICE, Ltd. <br /> Marvin A. Liszt <br /> MAL:mis <br /> Encls . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.