Laserfiche WebLink
i 1 <br /> Zoning File #2293 <br /> September 11, 1997 <br /> Page 2 <br /> A. This property is only marginally developable with septic systems due to steep slopes. <br /> Rezoning to an urban density coupled with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br /> would allow installation of municipal sewer. <br /> B. Development of this site at an urban density, while developing most of the Sollner <br /> property at a 2 acre density rather than the 1 acre density it is currently zoned for, <br /> allows a more efficient development in terms of reduced road and utility lengths and <br /> costs. <br /> C. The proposal limits the ultimate length of Wildhurst Trail,which already exceeds the <br /> City's 1000' length limit for dead ends with no secondary outlet. <br /> During the sketch plan review, Council suggested that rezoning is perhaps only feasible if <br /> the result is no more buildable lots than would have been created without the rezoning. This <br /> conceptually suggests that the developer must show adequate evidence of how many lots <br /> could have been developed under the current zoning, by showing a realistic plat layout and <br /> providing on-site sewage treatment system site evaluations for the properties not zoned for <br /> sewer. Absent such information, staff would offer the following density analysis: <br /> Maximum <br /> Estimated# "Realistic" <br /> Gross of Lots Per Estimated <br /> Total Area Zoned Zoned Density # of Lots* <br /> Van Sloun 4.8 ac. RR-1B 2 ac. (Septic) 2 2 <br /> Sollner 6.8 ac. LR-1B, 1 ac. (Sewer) 6 5 <br /> Morgart West 10.0 ac. RR-1B, 2 ac. (Septic) 5 3 <br /> Morgart East 4.7 ac. LR-1B, 1 ac. (Sewer) 4 3 <br /> 17 lots 13 lots <br /> *Based on excluding area for roads, stormwater ponding, etc. and staff estimated <br /> septic site potential. <br /> In staffs estimation the Morgart 10 acre parcel likely could only support 3 lots with septic <br /> systems due to the extremely steep slopes in the southwesterly half of that site. Staff <br /> estimates,then,that the total 26 acre group of parcels could realistically support 13 total lots <br /> under the current zoning. While the applicant proposes 14 lots, it would be critical to <br />