My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997 - Zoning File 2293
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Wildhurst Trail
>
1003 Wildhurst Trail - 07-117-23-21-0016/0002
>
Land Use
>
1997 - Zoning File 2293
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:32:05 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 1:04:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1003
Street Name
Wildhurst
Street Type
Trail
Address
1003 Wildhurst Tr
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
0711723210002
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MIhTUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON JUNE 16, 1997 <br /> (#13 -#2240 Jim Waters Sketch Plan- Continued) <br /> Waters indicated that the use of sketch plan 2 would not require a PRD. <br /> Lindquist and Smith felt sketch plan 3 made most sense. <br /> McMillan said she preferred Pither sketch plan 3 or two acre septics. She did not support <br /> mixing two acre and one acre zoning. <br /> Lindquist said he felt all of the lots should be sewered or not be sewered. <br /> Waters said he would need to speak with the City Engineer. He noted that the septic <br /> systems would not serve the public. <br /> McMillan said she was concerned with removal of trees and creating more traffic. <br /> Schroeder said the perimeter buffering is reminescent of Sugar Woods in maintaining the <br /> trees. He saw sketch plan 3 as having similarities to the Sugar Woods development plan. <br /> He would prefer less lots but understands the economical ramifications. Schroeder said he <br /> would prefer 16 sewered lots versus following the MUSA boundary. <br /> Stoddard indicated that this would follow the concept presented in sketch plan 1 with <br /> MUSA and 17 lots. Schroeder agreed but said he would prefer to see more clustering and <br /> open spaces as shown in sketch plan 3. Waters acknowledged that more is accomplished <br /> under sketch plan 3. <br /> Stoddard inquired whether there would be demand for homes shown in sketch plan 3 <br /> versus sketch plan 1. Waters said he feels that plan would work and either plan would <br /> sell. He felt the difference came to tree preservation and sewer in the street that would <br /> not be used in the immediate future. <br /> McMillan noted that three lots in sketch plan 3 were less than 40,000 s.f and asked the <br /> reasoning behind it. Waters said the lots could be enlarged by diminishing the outlot, but <br /> he was trying to create more common areas with walking paths and eliminate creating one <br /> riparian lot. He does not wish to see a boat dock but possibly a fishing dock only. <br /> Schroeder indicated that a homeowners association might request such a dock for boats. <br /> Gaffron said the Shoreland Ordinance would prevent that from occurring. <br /> Schroeder asked if Waters was considering walking trails. Waters said he would not want <br /> hard surface trails. <br /> ?1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.