My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997 - Zoning File 2293
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Wildhurst Trail
>
1003 Wildhurst Trail - 07-117-23-21-0016/0002
>
Land Use
>
1997 - Zoning File 2293
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:32:05 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 1:04:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1003
Street Name
Wildhurst
Street Type
Trail
Address
1003 Wildhurst Tr
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
0711723210002
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 15, 1997 <br /> (#2 -#2293 LGA Investment Group - Continued) <br /> Gaffron informed the Planning Commission that they and the Council must first conclude that the <br /> Comprehensive Plan and MUSA boundary amendment is appropriate, along with rezoning in order <br /> for the developer to proceed with this subdivision. Gaffron asked whether the Planning Commission <br /> wanted to discuss the issue of rezoning at this time. <br /> Lindquist asked Waters to comment. <br /> Waters reported there are compelling reasons and characteristics for the MUSA and rezoning <br /> request. He said he has tried to avoid the use of the platted access from the south, Garden Lane,to <br /> eliminate impact on the park and the upper area of the site with its significant slopes and trees. He <br /> suggested the MUSA boundaries would not be expanded but zoning would be traded. The Sollner <br /> property would go from within the MUSA to outside the MUSA and the Morgart property from <br /> outside to within. <br /> Waters indicated that the number of lots developed from the property would correspond if he used <br /> Garden Lane for access. He indicated that the proposal is a more sensible development plan <br /> allowing for clustering of homes, which Waters feels is more appropriate for the neighboring. He <br /> felt the reasons for rezoning were no less compelling than that of Sugar Woods, only different. <br /> The public were asked to comment. <br /> Steve Bell, a resident of West Branch Road, noted the significant changes that would occur to the <br /> environment. He asked what testing and assessment has been done, and if any, whether it has been <br /> shared with the Planning Commission. Waters informed him that a wetland delineation has been <br /> done as well as perc tests for the two sites on the west side. Lindquist said an EIS has not been done <br /> and would not be done. Berg reported that a development for 20-25 lots would require a Phase I <br /> EAW. <br /> Charles Boehm, Wildhurst Trail, said he resents the increases in property taxes. He felt the way the <br /> MUSA boundary is delineated within these properties is ridiculous. Boehm said he is opposed to <br /> over building and asked that common sense prevail. <br /> Helen Overboe, Forest Road, reported that the property is very heavily wooded and steep. She felt <br /> the development would lead to further erosion in the area. <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.