My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1995 - sewer conn
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Westlake Street (2)
>
372 Westlake St - 05-117-23-23-0044
>
Correspondence
>
1995 - sewer conn
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:20:49 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 1:34:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
372
Street Name
Westlake
Street Type
Street
Address
372 Westlake St
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0511723230044
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERLMAN LAW OFFICE, P.A. FEB 1 3 1995 <br /> ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br /> MICHAEL L.PERLMAN 426 PARKDALE PLAZA <br /> LAURA LEDSWORTH-WANG <br /> 1660 SOUTH HIGHWAY 100 <br /> DEBORAH S.BREZINA <br /> MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55416 <br /> LEGAL ASSISTANT <br /> TELEPHONE(612) 5449190 <br /> ALLAN F.SHAPIRO <br /> FAX(612)544-9233 <br /> OF COUNSEL <br /> February 10, 1995 <br /> Mr. Michael P. Gaffron <br /> Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br /> City of Orono <br /> P.O. Box 66 <br /> Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 <br /> RE: Maeser/Sewer Connection <br /> 372 W. Lake Street <br /> Dear Mr. Gaffron: <br /> I have reviewed your February 1, 1995 letter with Mr. Maeser. <br /> The options regarding the cabins that are proposed on pages 2 and <br /> 3 of your letter are not very attractive. Options 2 and 3 are <br /> cost-prohibitive, and my clients cannot consider them for that <br /> reason. That leaves options 1 and 4 . Option 1 is, obviously, of <br /> no benefit to my clients. They purchased the property in reliance <br /> upon the rental use of the cabins. Their income and livelihood <br /> depend in part on the rental use. <br /> Option 4 is the only one that the Maesers can realistically look <br /> at. However, the time frame for removal of the cabins (2 years) is <br /> too short for them to make plans for their financial future. Since <br /> Ordinance #105 has a 60 month provision for certain situations, my <br /> clients are requesting that the City grant approval of option 4, . <br /> with payment of the SAC charge for each cabin, for a period of 60 <br /> months. <br /> Please let me know how and when we might present this request <br /> before the City Council. <br /> Sincerely, 7 <br /> i <br /> 4,:fla gi,z t_._ <br /> ---q5A <br /> Iichael L. Perlman <br /> PERLMAN LAW OFFICE, P.A. <br /> MLP/db <br /> cc: Mr. and Mrs. Dean Maeser <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.