Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Tuesday,November 12,2019 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Smith to the Luce Line at the end of the street,and don't make the street shorter. If there is talk of a City <br /> easement, she would like to see what it looks like. <br /> Mr. Doug Whiteley, 60 Orono Orchard Road, said he has never seen an issue that caused an uproar like <br /> this other than a proposal to put a cell tower on the Orono Public Golf Course.There is an overwhelming <br /> negative response to the proposal. He thinks a permanent easement from Smith Avenue to Luce Line is a <br /> very viable solution,but putting one on Orono Orchard Road would be a tragic mistake. He walks to Luce <br /> Line 5-6 times a week with his dog,noting as you walk south around the curve from Woodhill Avenue, <br /> there's a straightaway and the Luce Line bridge going south,there is a blind spot and you cannot see cars <br /> going around the curve. It is dangerous;there's no shoulder and it is not safe.The topography of the <br /> proposed easement from Smith Avenue to Orono Orchard is very steep and makes no sense. He agrees <br /> with the previous speaker that the cul-de-sac should be by the dead end. He is not opposed to the cul-de- <br /> sac but is opposed to the Smith to Orono Orchard Road proposal. He never spoke to T.J. about swapping <br /> land. <br /> Mr. Sean Benson, 1220 Lyman Avenue, opposes the plan proposed by the Bonnetts. He referenced the <br /> Planning Staff's comment that they could not support the proposal unless, among other requests,there is <br /> "an inclusion of a trail easement from Smith to the Luce Line." He said this plan does not include that but <br /> is an easement that goes to Orono Orchard Road which does not make sense and is also a safety issue. He <br /> referenced an email from Mr.Bonnett which stated, "We will maintain the path that is currently available <br /> to all neighbors as invitees.This hopefully should not affect anyone too much.The permanent easement <br /> cannot be run directly through our property at this point in time as the property line will change if the <br /> vacation is granted." He said the plan appears to allow no direct access from Smith to the Luce Line. <br /> However, Mr. Bonnett is indicating neighbors can use the current trail but at his discretion. He does not <br /> feel that is an appropriate solution because a future property owner could decide not to allow trail access. <br /> He wanted to know if a resident of Orono,who doesn't live in the neighborhood,would be prevented <br /> from accessing the Luce Line from Smith Avenue.He believes it is better for the City Council to make an <br /> explicit decision about allowing community-wide access from Smith directly to the Luce Line. <br /> Mr. Benson also questioned the fundamental equity of this plan and said there's a lot of talk about cleanup <br /> as though it is normal that residents get free land,which he feels sets a dangerous precedent. He <br /> understands the City would give up .66 acres of land with the vacation and the Bonnetts would give up <br /> .06 acres of land for the cul-de-sac, so the Bonnetts would receive .6 acres of land at no cost. He does not <br /> think it is a benefit for any residents to receive City land at no cost. It also sets an inappropriate precedent <br /> for residents to request similar vacations in the future. He would propose an alternative plan whereby the <br /> City would move the cul-de-sac north to the end of Smith Avenue, and that way it would lead directly to <br /> the DNR-owned trail that leads to the Luce Line. In return for the cul-de-sac,the City could allow the <br /> Bonnetts to receive a similarly sized piece of land, .06 acres or something that is equitable. If the Bonnetts <br /> do not want to trade property,the City could consider putting in a hammerhead turnaround which should <br /> not require any exchange of land. The residents would get the turnaround, direct access from Smith to the <br /> Luce Line,the Bonnetts don't have to contend with people on their property,the City does not have to <br /> contend with any permanent easements while addressing safety concerns, and it is fair. <br /> Mr.Matt Hopping, 95 Smith Avenue, stated as far as traffic, it's UPS trucks and a few strange cars. The <br /> path was supposed to go straight to the Luce Line,not to Orono Orchard. If you walk along the ditch, <br /> there are culverts with water and other things. It should go straight at the end and the cul-de-sac should be <br /> right where the end of the road is now,or a hammerhead.A turnaround is not needed. People back in the <br /> driveways.Repave the road and make the road decent because it is a pretty rough road. He does not see <br /> Page 7 of 17 <br />