Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
-,cLOATp CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITy`'COUNCIL <br /> NO. 7061 <br /> 9kESH01'' <br /> A RESOLUTION <br /> APPROVING VARIANCES FROM <br /> MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTIONS 78-330; and 78-1700 <br /> FILE NO. LA19-000096 <br /> WHEREAS, on October 23, 2019, Gregory Andrew Hueler (hereinafter the <br /> "Applicant"), applied for variances from the City Code for the property addressed 1398 Rest Point <br /> Road and legally described as: <br /> Lot 3, Subdivision of Lot 14, Rest Point Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter the"Property"); <br /> WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for variances <br /> to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-330 to allow redevelopment of a substandard lot <br /> having 0.24 acres in area where 1.0 acre is required; and with 69 feet in width where 140 feet is <br /> required; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance <br /> to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-330 to allow a rear yard setback of 26.4 feet where <br /> a 30-foot setback is required; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance <br /> to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1403 to permit redevelopment at 22% structural <br /> coverage where 20% is the maximum allowed; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance <br /> to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1700 to allow 30.14% hardcover where 25% is <br /> allowed; and <br /> WHEREAS, on November 18, 2019, after published and mailed notice in accordance <br /> with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at <br /> which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity <br /> to speak thereon; and <br /> WHEREAS, on November 18, 2019, the Planning Commission recommended <br /> denial of the structural coverage variance, however recommended approval of the remaining <br /> variances. The Applicant was directed to redesign to meet 20% structural coverage; and <br />