My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-21-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
01-21-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2020 3:59:09 PM
Creation date
1/22/2020 9:41:44 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 12/18/2019 <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete:12/27/2019 "QOAt <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 02/25/2020 y <br /> To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members 11101 ,>, <br /> Dustin Rief, City Administrator <br /> 4kES H 04gc" <br /> From: Melanie Curtis, Planner VrOG <br /> Date: 21 January 2020 <br /> Subject: #LA19-000105,John Kraemer, 855 Old Crystal Bay Rd S, <br /> Variances:Average Lakeshore+ Lake Setback <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Application Summary: The applicant is requesting lake and average lakeshore setback <br /> variances in order to expand the envelope of a building as part of an in-kind replacement in <br /> order to meet floodplain regulations. <br /> Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. <br /> Background <br /> In 2019,the applicant began construction on a new residence on the property.The applicant has <br /> now requested lake and average lakeshore setback variances in order to expand the envelope of <br /> an existing accessory building as part of an in-kind replacement in order to meet floodplain <br /> regulations.The new building will have a flat roof,and must be elevated approximately 2.4 feet. <br /> This results in the corners of the flat roof expanding outwards from the sloped portions of the <br /> existing roof approximately 1.4 feet. The expansion of the nonconforming building is minimal. <br /> DASHED OUTLINE OF(E( <br /> SAUNA BUILDING <br /> -�� ENVELOPE,TO BE <br /> RFNOVED <br /> .I it <br /> ANNUAL STAINED <br /> - CEDAR TEG SIDING <br /> �-DASHED LINE OF(E( <br /> FINISH FIOOR <br /> Practical Difficulties Analysis <br /> Applicant Practical Difficulty Submittal Information:The applicant has identified the existing <br /> conditions: location on the property/setback,floor elevation, roof/ceiling height as practical <br /> difficulties supporting the requested variance(s). Additionally,they have provided supporting <br /> documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br /> additional testimony regarding the application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.