My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-21-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
01-21-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2020 3:59:09 PM
Creation date
1/22/2020 9:41:44 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 18, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 38 of 46 <br /> <br />McCutcheon said people love shallow lots, it is an average house. He asked if there was any variance that <br />wasn't included and if the lakeshore setback was good. <br /> <br />Ressler indicated the lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />Curtis confirmed that they are conforming to the 75, conforming to the average, conforming on the sides. <br /> <br />McCutcheon said since there is limited parking, a 3-car garage is almost a necessity because the driveway <br />can't be increased without impacting the hardcover as well. He asked how much the City was asking for it <br />to be reduced. <br /> <br />Curtis responded it was 222 square feet. <br /> <br />McCutcheon asked the applicant if he had played around with the design. <br /> <br />Mr. Hueler asked the Commission to look at the main floor, which is what would need to be shrunk. The <br />garage is a pretty standard size. The architect is opinionated about what can be shrunk and what can't <br />because of massing and making the house look architecturally correct, but if certain components of the <br />house are shrunk, it will look to him like the garage is eating the house. If they shrunk the family room, <br />dining room, and kitchen from the lake side, he would end up with a room that, according to the architect, <br />is not a good size room. These are not large spaces. The ceiling height is 2 feet below the height <br />restriction, and they did not want to raise the house up, so they are pretty close to the ground on the main <br />floor. That's part of the reason he wanted additional storage in the back hall, because he has no room to <br />put additional items in a basement. <br /> <br />McCutcheon asked what is over the second floor of the foyer in the entryway. <br /> <br />Mr. Hueler said it was a master bathroom and that none of the bedrooms are large. It is a challenging site. <br /> <br />Thiesse noted a couple years ago it was 15 percent. It was raised to 20 percent on the likelihood that <br />people could stay within 20 percent. Thiesse brought up a comment made by a previous Commissioner <br />who said, "It's a clean slate. You can make it work." He agrees with that. <br /> <br />Ressler said he tends to agree that as much as it would be nice to have a 3-car garage, it could easily be <br />amended to a 2-car garage and fit that 20 percentile, understanding that the hardcover would still be there <br />but that also provides more parking instead of a garage and structure. <br /> <br />Thiesse suggested a 2 1/2 car garage and then there would be storage. <br /> <br />Ressler stated he is in agreement with Staff, he would like to see it down to 20 percent, also based on <br />Thiesse's comments that it was 15 percent and that's something the Commission is already more flexible
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.