My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-21-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
01-21-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2020 3:59:09 PM
Creation date
1/22/2020 9:41:44 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 18, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 36 of 46 <br /> <br /> <br />Curtis confirmed his statement and indicated 22 percent was correct. <br /> <br />Mr. David Bieker, Denali Custom Homes, 18352 Minnetonka Boulevard, Deephaven, said he is <br />representing the applicant. He is the proposed builder of the property and has worked with the architect <br />and applicant to design the home. They are meeting the 75-foot setback and meeting the side yard <br />setbacks. The proposed house was designed as efficiently as possible to accommodate everything possible <br />that a home would have on the main floor. There cannot be a basement, so the only options are to fit <br />everything on the main floor and upstairs. Because of the lot size, you run up against structural hardcover <br />and regular hardcover. They looked at ways to shrink the house, but the only real way to shrink it is to <br />shrink the garage which then is a garage that is not deep enough to use. If you compress the house, the <br />rooms start getting tight inside and aren't really functional. If you pull the garage in, that creates a longer <br />driveway to get to the garage, which doesn't improve the overall hardcover. He thinks the applicant is <br />proposing to do the best he can with what he has and mitigate all the negative effects of the house. <br /> <br />They are also removing a garage which is in the corner of the property that actually sits on the road. The <br />setback for the road for the garage is about a foot, and the proposal is increasing the setback by more than <br />25 feet. There are other homes that are either on the street or very close to the street, so that situation has <br />been improved as far as setback. He thinks the only objection that Staff brought was the structural <br />hardcover, and he thinks if the house is shrunk, they'll have the same overall hardcover because the <br />driveway would have to grow to meet the house. <br /> <br />Libby asked what the difference is between the 22 and 20 percent, square footage-wise. <br /> <br />Curtis stated it is 222 square feet. <br /> <br />Mr. Bieker said if you study the plan, there's nothing extravagant or that doesn't need to be there. <br /> <br />Ressler asked for the dimensions of the garage, whether it was 24 x 30. <br /> <br />Curtis said she thought it was 21 by 31 unless she measured wrong. <br /> <br />Mr. Bieker stated it is 31 feet wide. He believed it is 31 feet deep to the curb inside the garage. <br /> <br />Mr. Drew Hueler stated this is his proposed new house at 1398 Rest Point Road. The garage dimensions <br />are 21 feet deep. <br /> <br />Curtis stated she thought that is what she measured it to and should have double checked the inside <br />measurement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.