My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-21-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
01-21-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2020 3:59:09 PM
Creation date
1/22/2020 9:41:44 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 18, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 13 of 46 <br /> <br />Ms. Fieger suggested the Commission listen to her neighbors' comments. <br /> <br />Ressler said during the public hearing they could maybe help explain things, but he'd like the Commission <br />to ask some questions and he may bring the applicant back up after the public comments to help clarify. <br />Ressler stated it is critical, because if they give the applicant access but see that the dock is placed in the <br />wrong place and then pull it, the Commission has to do it over again in a year. He is not sure the way the <br />applicant is wanting to do it works. He appreciates the applicant's comment because intention is helpful <br />for the Commission. <br /> <br />McCutcheon, referencing the red arrow on the map, said he understands the applicant would not want the <br />dock there because it is a swimming beach and it's not easy to get to because there's a lot of trees. <br /> <br />Ms. Fieger stated there is a ravine, so walking there is difficult. By having the shared dock to the far-right <br />side, it doesn't infringe on anything else. As a landowner, walking up it's a fairly steep hill, but it's a direct <br />shot. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated in a perfect world the applicant would be purchasing an Easement along that property line. <br /> <br />Ms. Fieger indicated he was correct. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked what would happen if the City were to purchase that Easement and go through the same <br />process. <br /> <br />Gettman clarified that Thiesse was not proposing for her to purchase the Easement. <br /> <br />Thiesse said right now the Commission is allowing her to be on a City Easement. If the City buys the <br />Easement it is a City Easement, and she could put her dock over there and it's the same process. <br /> <br />Ressler stated he would defer to Staff. <br /> <br />Barnhart said that would imply the City is interested in buying additional land, whether it's Easement or <br />right-of-way rights, which he does not believe the City is. It is important to respond to the request that's in <br />front of the Commission, and if the Commission feels there's a different way to get to where they want to <br />go that involves an Ordinance Amendment, they could add that to their recommendation. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Selden Robb, 570 Big Island, said he owns the large lot in discussion. He used the map to show the <br />locations of the docks. He stated if another dock went in the area, it's one more dock in the line cutting all <br />the beaches down so there are smaller spaces. He asked if a dock is put on public property, can anybody <br />on the lake who happens to know it's a public access come in and use the dock, or are the Fiegers going to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.