07-16-2018 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

LA18-000061 July 16, 2018 Page 4 of 4 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The application has stated the shallow lot has setback challenges for construction of a single family home. The property is unique in size for this zoning district. The Commission should discuss whether the additional 18 feet of structure is necessary or a convenience. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds is inherent practical difficulties with the small lot on the LR -1A, 2 acre zone. The applicant has made an effort to meet the district standards for a new home and is requesting the rear yard setback, lot area and lot width variances. The Commission should discuss whether the rear yard setback encourages development out of character with the neighborhood. Engineer Comments A full review will be done at the time of building permit application. 1. The applicant will need to ensure that none of the hardcover runoff is directed toward the neighboring lots. 2. The applicant will need to apply for a utility permit concurrent with any demo permit to ensure the sanitary sewer service is properly disconnected. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 2. The Commission should review discuss the proposed house as it fits into the character of the neighborhood. 3. The applicant is not requesting a height variance at this time. The commission should confirm the home will not exceed the 30 foot maximum height requirement. 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested variances. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Proposed Survey and Setback Map Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Property Owners List and Map Exhibit G. Site Pictures