Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,February 13,2006 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (Brian Fulmer,The Dog House,Continued) <br /> McMillan noted that the City. of Long Lake is located adjacent to the Luce Line,which also needs to be <br /> taken into consideration. <br /> Sansevere inquired how close the nearest neighbor would be. <br /> Fulmer noted the 875 Wayzata Boulevard property is almost 1 l acres. <br /> Gaffron displayed an aerial photo of the Wayzata property and surrounding area. <br /> Sansevere inquired whether there could be a probationary period placed on this use if the operation is <br /> located to the Wayzata property. <br /> Brokl noted that a public hearing would need to be held for whichever location is decided upon. <br /> White stated in his view it would be appropriate to table this discussion until further information is <br /> provided. <br /> Murphy stated he is reluctant to say he would be in favor of relocating the operation to 875 Wayzata <br /> Boulevard without formal plans being submitted. Murphy indicated he has grave concerns with locating <br /> this operation near the Luce Line and the Long Lake neighborhood. <br /> Sansevere commented he would have preferred that Mr.Fulmer would have approached the City months <br /> ago rather than waiting until the last minute. <br /> White stated he would like to see a plan showing how the property would be utilized. <br /> Sansevere suggested the dog runs be located as far away from the Luce Line as possible. <br /> McMillan concurred that this matter needs to go through the proper process before a decision can be <br /> made. <br /> Gaffron stated the City currently does not have an established business licensing process. Gaffron stated <br /> the City currently licenses garbage haulers and liquor establishments but that the City would need to <br /> develop appropriate language to deal with this type of operation. <br /> Sansevere encouraged Mr.Fulmer to decide which property would work best for him and then proceed <br /> forward. <br /> Gaffron stated a public hearing would need to be held on each different property and that that would not <br /> be ideal. Gaffron concurred that Mr. Fulmer should decide on which property would work best. <br /> McMillan stated from a public perception the Eisinger property might be more workable. <br /> It was the consensus of the City Council that Mr. Fulmer work with Staff further on this matter. <br /> PAGE 21 of 25 <br />