Laserfiche WebLink
°moo CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 6771 <br /> NO. <br /> t�Kf S H O�� <br /> proposed temporary use is anticipated to be adequately served by existing <br /> services and facilities <br /> (4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system. The <br /> needs for water supply and sewage disposal"M be provided by the operators <br /> of the site, as municipal sewer and water are not currently available. <br /> (5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public <br /> cost.No excessive public services or public costs are anticipated based on the <br /> proposed temporary use. Any costs of monitoring the site for compliance will <br /> be charged back to the applicant <br /> (6)Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and <br /> as it is planned to be used in the future. The area is guided for residential <br /> development. To the east, an active commercial apple orchard exists. The <br /> owners of this orchard have expressed concern with dust and contaminants into <br /> their Orchard. The applicant has failed to provide evidence that these concerns <br /> can be mitigated <br /> (7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of <br /> character is called for in the community management plan. The proposed <br /> temporary use is bordered on the south, west and north by arterial roadways. <br /> " The temporary use is not consistent with the character of the surrounding <br /> area as the area is dominated by rural and passive uses. <br /> (8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the <br /> surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community <br /> management plan. Material storage is inconsistent with buildings and site <br /> improvements surrounding the site, as they are rural residential uses. <br /> (9)Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property <br /> in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the <br /> area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. <br /> Neighboring property owners have expressed concerns regarding the <br /> potential for air, water and noise pollution associated with the construction <br /> staging and materials storage and recycling temporary uses. The applicant <br /> has failed to demonstrate how the noise from rock crushing activities will be <br /> mitigated or addressed to ensure the activities will not disrupt neighboring <br /> properties. <br /> (10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable <br /> views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses. The applicant has not <br /> shown to the satisfaction of the City Council that dust and other potential <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />