My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-05-1998 Park Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
01-05-1998 Park Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 9:06:22 AM
Creation date
1/14/2020 9:06:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 5, 1998 <br /> (#4 Carpenter Property Sketch Plan - Continued) <br /> Discussion was held regarding the retaining walls. The fence currently located on the <br /> property could be placed on top of the retaining walls. The stone gates can be moved. <br /> McDermott asked about the pond. Welles said the route could come back in from the <br /> pond. Wilson voiced opposition to retaining walls suggesting the grade be taken down. <br /> She thought lilac bushes would be attractive. Gappa said some retaining walls would be <br /> necessary. Wilson questioned whether the use of retaining walls would hinder the rural <br /> character of the area. Erickson questioned whether the new large homes would also <br /> affect the rural feel. <br /> Wilson asked if any of the Commissioners were interested in taking land for a buffer on <br /> the lake. Problems with access, marshy conditions, and acquiring lakeshore were noted. <br /> It was determined that with the lineal footage on Old Crystal Bay Road, a width of about <br /> 40' could be obtained. A bike route would require between 20-30'. Welles felt it would <br /> make sense to take the minimal amount of land and the remainder in cash. If land was <br /> taken for buffering only, less land would be required. <br /> The current trail on the east side has been cleared and gravel has been added. There are <br /> several large trees on this side. The terrain is better for a bike route on the west side. <br /> Wilson suggested recommending the bike route for the west side, even though the bike <br /> route currently exists on the east side. If the Council determines they do not desire a <br /> change to the bike route, she suggested money be taken in lieu of land for park <br /> dedication. The Park Commission would like to see the bike route be completed to <br /> Noerenberg Park and is concerned with completion of the bike route on the east side due <br /> to the location of existing homes. <br /> McDermott felt the bike route could cross to the west side in another area and preferred <br /> cash be taken for park dedication. Wilson indicated this scenario would cause the bike <br /> route to cross the roadway twice. Wilson voiced concern with being able to complete the <br /> trail to Noerenberg if this land was not taken for park dedication. Gappa agreed that it is <br /> important for the trail to continue and be completed. <br /> Welles moved, Ilse seconded, to recommend park dedication be taken in the minimum <br /> amount of land necessary for the design of a bike route to maintain the character of the <br /> property with the remainder taken in cash. <br /> Welles amended his motion to recommend that as the Planning Commission evaluates the <br /> project, they consider taking land for a bike route and review the problem with continuing <br /> the current bike route on the east side owned by the City. The Park Commission needs to <br /> analyze whether the need is shown for the trail on the west side. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.