10-06-1997 Park Commission Minutes

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF TH� REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 6, 1997 (#9A Garden Lane Subdivision - Continued) Gappa said the subdivision would extend to the cul-de-sac, which would be constructed by the developer, but the developer of Lot 3 would have to extend the road to serve that property. Waters indicated that this would be an expensive endeavor. Gappa said it would only involve a driveway rather than a road. Waters informed the Park Commissioners that a developers agreement would specify the terms of the easement. Gappa added that it would be a drainage easement and limitations would be stipulated. Waters said it would also be delineated as a wetland. He showed the extent of the wetlands to Welles noting the easement extends beyond the wetland. Welles indicated he would be inclined not to take land at that location. Waters responded that he thought it would make sense to take that land as it would be the only opportunity to do so. Wilson inquired about the development of Lots 4, 5, and 6. Waters said he is currently reviewing the plans far that and additional property for development. Gappa reported that they were separate applications, and this particular subdivision was not at the point of review by the Commission. Welles said he did not see the benefit of taking land due to the natural area, the impact on the Garden Lane extension, and the protection of land in the area. He preferred to take cash. Beal was informed that the cash would amount to 8% of the assessed value of the 6 lots, which is currently unknown. It was estimated the range would be around $20,000. McDermott favored taking land. Even with the wetland delineation and drainage easement, McDermott thought the easement would be of less value when held up against the private property rights of individuals. He suggested the City possibly condemn Lot 3 and making a continuing park land including the road and this 8% of land. Wilson asked McDermott how he would feel if the City was not interested in condemning Lot 3. McDermott said if there was a driveway to the lot and the property is heavily wooded, he would still feel it would add significantly to the appearance of the area. He voiced concern with the cutting of trees for a yard and additions built such as sheds or swing sets. Welles felt there was adequate protection under the zoning ordinances. Beal thought the decision was difficult without knowing the assessed value. He said he was inclined to take the cash as it would be difficult to get to the land. 3