Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR �RONO PARK COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON MARCH 3, 1997 <br /> (#2 - Park Dedication Fund - Cantinued) <br /> McDermott indicated the poor conditions found at Navarre Park and asked that the <br /> Cammission respond with plans for improvement or sell the property. <br /> Ilse was concerned with the Commission responding ta the concerns expressed by the <br /> citizens, "the squeaky wheel" concept, as well as planning for park upgrades. White <br /> agreed that priorities need to be made but has seen a vast improvement in planning. <br /> Gappa questioned whether the costs for park up�rades are in line with what is proposed. <br /> McDermott suggested reviewin� costs paid by other cities as well. He would like to see <br /> upgrades done well at each park rather than many improvements partially done. Wilsan <br /> felt the subcommittee should address the costs and concerns at Antoine in comparison to <br /> ather park equipment upgrades. McDermott said he would not want to see the <br /> improvements scaled back. <br /> The Park Cammission expressed concern aver lack of knowledge regarding the financial <br /> situation of the Park Dedication Fund. The Commission would like a clear idea on how <br /> and where the costs are spent. Gappa will research past expenditures, and White will <br /> follow up. A report will be made in ApriL It was noted that the park survey reflected a <br /> willingness from the residents to assist in paying for park improvements. <br /> Van Zomeren passed out information on Park Dedication fees collected on previous <br /> subdivisions. This report was prepared in response to an objection by the Fullerton <br /> application regarding payment of Park Dedication Fund fees. Gappa noted that <br /> Minnetrista has a fee plan that also includes a cap. Van Zomeren suggested the Park <br /> Commission write a cover letter to submit to the Council reflecting their opinions <br /> regarding collection of Park Dedication fees. McDermott voiced concern that other <br /> applicants would contest their fees if the fee was not char�ed to this particular application. <br /> He asked that the Council be made aware of this concern. Gappa said he felt the Council <br /> also had this same concern. <br /> Wilson explained to Van Zomeren how the Commission has been reviewing the <br /> applications regarding recommendations for possible trails or Park Dedication fees. She <br /> asked that the Commission be able to review the applications in a manner that would be <br /> convenient tv the present application procedure system. Van Zomeren said the sketch <br /> plan review results in no action taken. If reviewed at this time by the Park Commission, <br /> tl3eir inp�xt could be included in the Planning Commission package for preliminary plan <br /> review. <br /> 3 <br />