My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-03-1996 Park Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
06-03-1996 Park Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 8:14:23 AM
Creation date
1/14/2020 8:14:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON JUNE 3, 1996 <br /> (#2 P�rk plan �oals and Objectives - Continued) <br /> Gaetten asked the Park Commission to consider what their role is and suggested that the <br /> role be placed up front in the objectives. McDermott read the vision statement. Beal <br /> questioned whether there was already a mission stated or if the Commission was <br /> attempting ta justify what they are doing? V�'ilson commented that what the Park <br /> Commission wants is consistent with that of the Co�ncil. White noted that the charge of <br /> the Park Commission is in the Comprehensive Plan. Gerhardson said the Commission <br /> should refer to the Statutues for a definition of the Park Commission's Mission, as the City <br /> is a statute city, not a charter city. <br /> Wilson said she thought °A" is what the Commission is trying to accomplish noting the <br /> Commission is the City's vehicle by which this is accomplished. Flint said he saw the <br /> Commission as one component with the citizens, staff, and Council making up the rest of <br /> the equation. Flint said "A" is our primary function, but is nothing, without the other three <br /> components. <br /> Ilse suggested to take "F", as noted in the table of contents, which she sees as the role of <br /> the Park Commission and make it an entity in itself, rather than one of the objectives. <br /> Flint said he had also noted in his comments if"F" was located in the right area within the <br /> plan. <br /> Goetten informed the Commission that she saw the group as the conduit for what is done. <br /> Wilson acknowledged the Commission's advisory capacity but did not feel the Commission <br /> was in a management role as noted in "F". Goetten said the ideas come from the <br /> Commission, however, in addition to being an advisory body. White said he saw the <br /> group as advisors to the policy makers. Flint said it was necessary to see what the <br /> statutue says about a park commission. McDermott asked Gerhardson to get him a copy <br /> of the statutue. <br /> It was decided that "F" would be moved to be "II" in the plan as the Park Commission <br /> Mandate. <br /> Wilson noted a statement in the old policy regarding park planning as a "management tool <br /> for City staff." She said this should be used as a guideline. McDermott said he would add <br /> this to the intraduction. <br /> Beal asked if the Commission was a conduit versus an advisory position. The Park <br /> Commission was said to be an active advisory gi-�up, �viuclr studied and �t-ioriti�eu iiie <br /> work to be done, and made recommendations. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.