Laserfiche WebLink
,�� � <br /> MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO PARK C-OMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD �N SEPTEMBER 6, 1994 <br /> �Itern#4 -Old Crystal Bay Bike Traii- Continued) <br /> Wilson restated the current strategy to go ahead with this piece of the trail and see how it <br /> fits with the rest. Gerhardson stated Bryant has not yet discussed the recent plan with ths <br /> Henne�in County Board. McMillan stated the need to keep a detailed account of the <br /> costs. The commissioners stated their cancern over the eurrent involvement without an <br /> agreement in hand. Gerhardson stated the City Counci} had agreed to da a trail with this <br /> section from CoRd 6 to Kelley Parkway and to connect with the Luce Line within five <br /> years. The City Council needs to have an agreement between Hennepin County and the <br /> city before they can proceed. The park commissioners yuestioned their role at this time. <br /> Howells asked the status of the bike trail c�n BrQwn Raad. Gerhardson stated it is to begin <br /> September 12. The cost is braken down by percentage with five of the eight feet (or <br /> 5/Sths) paid with Murticipal State Aid money. The City Council has chosen nat to assess <br /> for the City's share hut no decisian has been made where the fund is coming fram. <br /> McMillan stated the Park Dedication Fund is a possihility. Wilson asked the cost af the <br /> project_ Gerhards�n stated approximately $600,000 for the rQad and trail. <br /> Howells moved to continue discussion at next meeting requesting Gerhardsan to che,ck <br /> with Moorse on Bryant's meeting with the Board and with City Council on the long range <br /> plan. Vongries added to motion the Park Commission's willingness to have a work <br /> session. Gerhardson suggested tabling the matter to next meeting when Flint will be <br /> pres�nt. Matian made by Howelis, seconded by McMillan to tahle fiirther discussion until <br /> ne�meeting.. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> �#€S) SL�M�IIT BEACH <br /> Gerhardst�n spake with the City's insurance carrier regarding the facilities at Summit <br /> Beach. This was in response to the remQval of swimming docks because af the issue of <br /> liability. The insurance agent stated there is no problem with swimming docks artd that <br /> one must ct�nsider what is reasonable. Vongries asked if there were problems with having <br /> neither lifeguard nar phane. Gerhardson stated there was not. Vongries asked if City <br /> Council had anything to add. Gerhardson and Wilson said the matter was not braught ta <br /> the cour�cil. <br /> 3 <br />