My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-07-1994 Park Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
03-07-1994 Park Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2020 3:55:54 PM
Creation date
1/13/2020 3:55:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 7, 1994 <br /> (#3) PARK PLANNING - CONT. <br /> The issues and needs forum gives people an opportunity to discuss park concerns and provides <br /> a way for the community to work together. After that is done, the next phase is the "Inventory <br /> and Analysis" which would provide an overall picture of peoples' thoughts and support. The <br /> third phase would enable adoption of specific goals and objectives. This would lead to the <br /> preparation of a working set of park standards. During the final phase, a master park system <br /> program would be developed with suggestions for possible alternative ways to reach the desired <br /> goals. <br /> Chair Flint asked for an explanation of Shardlow's statement regarding the City's need to take <br /> action on this issue soon. <br /> Shardlow said he felt there was pressure for development and a number of options could be <br /> closed off to the City if the matter is delayed. It is always most cost effective to acquire land <br /> before it is developed. Condemnation after development increases costs and is disruptive <br /> socially. He reiterated his statement that there is no need to commit to the whole process and <br /> the process can be done in stages. <br /> Chair Flint inquired as to the cost and amount of time involved for the whole process. <br /> Shardlow estimated the cost would be approximately $19,000 to $27,000. <br /> Maorse explained the cost of a telephone survey by Decision Resources would be approximately <br /> $7,000. About 400 residents would be canvassed with a questionnaire of 60 or 70 questions. <br /> McMillan asked the length of time per call. <br /> Moorse said it would be 20 to 40 minutes. <br /> Vongries commented that a scientifically statistically valid survey could be achieved with a <br /> written form sent to every household. <br /> Shardlow stated he did not disagree with this approach but pointed out that it would take time <br /> to administer. <br /> White added that a survey could be done in three ways - house-to-house (most expensive but <br /> accurate), telephone survey or mail. He stressed the need and importance of a survey. <br /> Isle said both the season and time of day would be important factors to consider in doing a <br /> survey. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.