My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-06-1992 Park Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
07-06-1992 Park Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2020 3:21:52 PM
Creation date
1/13/2020 3:21:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 6, 1992 <br /> GOLF COURSE - CONT. <br /> McMillan suggested the Park Commission get involved and study the <br /> golf course . <br /> (#4) CONSIDERATION OF STATEMENT ON HIGHWAY 12 <br /> Chair Flint explained that per the previous action of the Park <br /> Commission Members regarding maintaining Highway 12 on the existing <br /> corridor , he had appeared at the MnDot public hearing and had <br /> drafted a letter expressing those views . He asked for input on the <br /> letter, a draft of which had been sent to all Park Commission <br /> Members. <br /> Ilse felt the impact on open space and solitude , the run-off and <br /> impact to wetlands should also be included . <br /> Wilson seconded the ecological impact of the freeway through Orono. <br /> Jabbour stated that the Watershed District had endorsed the <br /> southern route for Highway 12 but perhaps had not considered all <br /> the water problems inherent in that route . <br /> Ilse felt that the comments in the letter need to be stronger . <br /> Wilson asked about the DNR' s opinion on the issue . <br /> Jabbour nated they have chosen to stay out of the issue because of <br /> their desire to build an access in Orono. <br /> Chair Flint asked about the Council ' s position on the no-build or <br /> minimum upgrade alternatives . <br /> Jabbour stated that Orono is in an alliance with five other <br /> communities on this issue, of which some of those communities <br /> desire some upgrade . Rather than dissolve the alliance with those <br /> communities, Orono has decided to agree to a build option on the <br /> existing corridor . <br /> Butler said she is not opposed to upgrading the corridor , and doing <br /> nothing to the corridor may create safety hazards. <br /> Jabbour suggested not using the term "no-build" , but rather limited <br /> upgrade . <br /> Ilse left the meeting at this time. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.