My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-02-1992 Park Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
03-02-1992 Park Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2020 3:20:22 PM
Creation date
1/13/2020 3:20:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1992 <br /> CLIFF OTTEN SUBDIVISION — CONT. <br /> Chair Flint reviewed that if Parcel B and C were not being divided <br /> at this time, Parcel A would not be considered at ali for park <br /> dedication because it is merely a lot line rearrangement . <br /> Vongries noted the exclusion of Parcel A will not dramatically <br /> affect the City, but may deter the appiicant from continuing . <br /> However , he reminded them that they cannot consider the person <br /> requesting and noted they should consider the precedent they are <br /> setting . <br /> Chair Flint stated that Otten doesn ' t want to pay the park <br /> dedication fee at this time, the application could be changed to <br /> a lot line rearrangement . <br /> Johnston suggested they assign dedication for only 2 acres of the <br /> 14 acre parcel and collect the remainder at the time of a future <br /> subdivision of the property. <br /> Vongries felt they could not do that . <br /> Wilson stated she had a problem requesting so much money from <br /> someone who is not developing the land further. <br /> Johnston disagreed and stated they cannot distinguish between the <br /> two scenarios . <br /> Chair Flint felt park dedication should not be required for Parcel <br /> A. <br /> Johnston asked if the developer of Sugarwoods came in with a <br /> proposal to rearrange all lot lines , how the Commission felt about <br /> reassessing park dedication fees . <br /> Chair Flint felt they would not be charged additional money . <br /> It was moved by Johnston , seconded by Vongries , to recommend the <br /> application be considered as a subdivision for park dedication <br /> purposes, and to request payment of a park dedication fee in lieu <br /> of park land dedicated . <br /> It was moved by Bradley , seconded by Wilson , to amend the motion <br /> to clarify that the subdivision is between Parcel B and C. Ayes <br /> 3 , nays 4. Motion failed . <br /> The Commission voted on the original motion . Ayes 7 , nays 0 . <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.