Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1992 <br /> CLIFF OTTEN SUBDIVISION - CONT. <br /> Cliff Otten was present and explained he is proposing the <br /> rearrangement of the lot lines between Parcel A (market property) <br /> and Parcel B ( residential property) , and a subdivision of Parcel <br /> B and C as he wishes to sell the parcel with the existing <br /> residence . He explained there would be no change in use and the <br /> larger parcel is used for nursery stock . He explained the larger <br /> parcel currently has two tax identification numbers, so thereforF <br /> it really is not a creation of a new lot but merely a lot lir,� <br /> rearrangement . He stated that Parcel A (market property) would be <br /> reduced from 1 . 64 acres to 1 . 5 acres , but actually gains useable <br /> space. Otten explained that th�- larger parcel would be legally <br /> combined into one par�el after final approval . He explained that <br /> the larger parczl will be 16. 4 acres and Parcel B will be <br /> approximately 2 . 3 acres . He noted Mabusth supplied him with a copy <br /> �f the park dedication ordinance and he was unclear as to when he <br /> would be required to comply . <br /> Gerhardson stated this is in a two acre zoning district . <br /> Otten explained he started the subdivision process between the two <br /> larger parcels 18 months ago, but due to an incorrect title <br /> opinion , needed to go through the necessary paper work to clear up <br /> the documents with regards to Old County Road 6 . <br /> Gerhardson stated at th i s t i me he had no opt i ons for the Comm i ss i on <br /> to consider . <br /> Chair Flint felt this was a readjustment of lot lines . <br /> Johnston reminded the Commission that park dedication fees have not <br /> been paid for any of the land . He noted the intent of the <br /> ordinance entitles the City to 8% of the value or 8% of the land . <br /> He felt that if the 8% cash or land was not taken at this point , <br /> the chance may not occur again as Parcel C could be developed with <br /> one home without being required to pay park dedication . <br /> Otten stated that 8% of the valuation would make the lot line <br /> rearrangement not worth doing . <br /> Chair Flint informed the Commission that they would need to decide <br /> whether this application is a subdivision or merely a lot line <br /> rearrangement . He asked if it were necessary to request an <br /> easement for a bike trail along County Road 6 . <br /> 'Gerhardson reminded the Commission that property on the north side <br /> of County Road 6 is owned by Hennepin Parks , which could be used <br /> for trail . <br /> 4 <br />