Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETINQ OF NOVEM��� �� ���� <br /> ORONO SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT PLAN REVIEW — CONT. <br /> Kokal asked the status of the lift station and Gerhardson noted <br /> that it is active and would have to remain. <br /> Skalicky felt that the lift station is a negative for residential <br /> development. <br /> Bradley noted that it is very loud at times and Gerhardson stated <br /> that there is daily maintenance of the station. <br /> Chair Flint noted that his concern was running the road along the <br /> pond. He asked if the northern portion could be retained as <br /> park land. <br /> Skalicky noted that both she and City staff felt that it would <br /> provide for a too secluded park and may invite undesireable <br /> situations for the residential development to the south. She <br /> noted that there is a road that currently runs to the northern <br /> portion of the property. She felt that the MWCC may consider <br /> moving the fence 10-15' to allow for more roadway between the <br /> lift station and the pond. <br /> Chair Flint asked if Skalicky intended to prepare a packet of <br /> these sketches for the Commission and the Council . She noted <br /> that she would be doning that. <br /> Bradley asked if it would be better to wait to develop the <br /> property until the adjoining property to the west is proposed for <br /> development. <br /> Skalicky noted there is a small wetlands within that property <br /> also and would not necessarily facilitate easier development of <br /> this property. <br /> Gerhardson asked if a variance would have to be granted for the <br /> roadway to the northern portion of the property. Skalicky was <br /> unsure. <br /> Chair Flint asked Skalicky to include the map from the U. S. <br /> Wildlife within her packet to be submitted. <br /> Bradley asked again if it would be best to incorporate the land <br /> to the west for development. <br /> Skalicky felt that the entire area is disconnected because of the <br /> lift station and the small wetlands. <br /> Chair Flint felt that it is unrealistic to show lots that small . <br /> Gerhardson noted that perhaps the property could be developed as <br /> a PRD. <br /> 5 <br />