Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> 3 <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL SH04�G NO. 5 4 7 <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File#05-3185. <br /> 2. The property is located in the (I) Industrial District. The property is subject to a number of <br /> prior approvals documented in Resolutions No. 4845 (August 2002); No. 4993 (June 2003); <br /> No. 5059 (October 2003); No. 5084 (November 2003); No. 5250 (November 2004); and <br /> No. 5388 (October 2005). <br /> 3. Applicant proposes a 150' x 175' (25,620 s.f.) addition to the main building, squaring off <br /> the southwest corner of the building. <br /> 4. Applicant proposes to create a 10' x 25' walkway connection between the two existing <br /> detached truck garages. <br /> 5. Applicant proposes to abandon the south half of the 200' x 200' parking lot extension <br /> approved in 2005, which has has been graded and graveled, but not paved. Applicant is <br /> proposing to create a new 160' x 220' (35,000 s.f.) parking area directly south of the new <br /> main building addition, plus a new 26' x 210' (5,500 s.f.) connecting driveway south of <br /> the truck garage. The net result is 20,500 s.f. of bituminous hardcover over and above the <br /> level of previous approvals. <br /> 6. Applicant requests a CUP per Section 78-1366 to allow two (2) 60-foot high flag poles, <br /> where the code would normally limit such poles to 40'. One would be located directly <br /> behind the new monument sign adjacent to Highway 12, the second to be located in the <br /> midpoint of the large easterly parking area, about 450' south of Highway 12 and 180' <br /> west of the east lot line. <br /> 7. Applicant requests an amendment of the existing CUP conditions within Resolution No. <br /> 4845 to allow, as part of the fleet sales and leasing element of the operation, more than <br /> the 40 `demonstration' or `display' vehicles currently allowed, but those in excess of 40 <br /> would be stored to the south end of the east lot. <br /> 8. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 17, 2006 and on a vote <br /> of 5-1 recommended approval all elements of the current request with the exception of the <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br />