My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015 - 01251 - addn/remodel/repair
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Wayzata Boulevard West
>
2160 Wayzata Boulevard West - 34-118-23-21-0002
>
Permits/Inspections
>
2015 - 01251 - addn/remodel/repair
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:54:04 PM
Creation date
1/13/2020 10:40:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2160
Street Name
Wayzata
Street Type
Boulevard
Street Direction
West
Address
2160 Wayzata Boulevard West
Document Type
Permits/Inspections
PIN
3411823210002
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roger Peitso <br /> From: Richard Storlien <rstorlien@comcast.net> <br /> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 9:47 AM <br /> To: Roger Peitso <br /> Subject: Orono Station plan <br /> Attachments: 151007 code review.pdf <br /> Roger, <br /> Just wanted to drop you an email regarding the Orono Station plan for Brad Erickson. <br /> I know there were a few discrepancies on the plan review. <br /> I am attaching an update review sheet. <br /> Building code should have been noted as ICC 2012 <br /> The building is technically a IIB structure but I am not sure if over the years some of the tenant spaces may have been <br /> done with wood studs. The existing structure is all concrete and steel. I thought as long as the area calculation worked <br /> that the VB was a better choice. <br /> The building does have a partial sprinkler system which was installed originally for a commercial kitchen restaurant <br /> use. The space is still there but not operating at this time. There are plans in the future to possibly bring a small café or <br /> something back into that space. I did not use the sprinkler increase in the area calculation due to the fact that it is only <br /> partially protected at this time. It was designed to expand but not needed for any current improvements. <br /> The area increase calculation was off. I had not read the complete code section before crunching numbers. (ICC code <br /> section 506.2 & 506.2.1)The actual increase should be 65%instead of the 108% I had noted. <br /> Let me know if there are any other questions or concerns. I can drop off new signed copies with this information <br /> included. <br /> Rick <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.