Laserfiche WebLink
Page / of 1 <br /> SIDRPT Rev 10/09 <br /> BRAUN <br /> NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report <br /> City of IOC on v <br /> Report No.: Date of This Report: - 7 - / <br /> Project Name: QF,,,,,, Si /7/,,,,-",-, Project No.: 64 - // 0/(j/94 <br /> Project Address: ,e,1,,,,, /44 .,:e /',. t, jr <br /> Client: /C,47 Client Project No.: <br /> Project Manager: / ,-.- /7e CG..e4,, Temp/Weather: 2 7 <br /> Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: <br /> ❑ Continuous 0 Masonry ,.2:( Rebar Placement 0 Foundations 0 Special Cases <br /> L .Periodic 0 Welding & Bolting 6L Concrete Placement 0 fireproofing <br /> 0 Piles& Piers 0 Tendon Placement ,, Soils <br /> Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No 41 <br /> Description and location of work completed: 44rwe i 3-2,./A /�% r lam. e__,.,J.,_ <br /> ,��.-cam f 1-.1,7/ ,r /.� /gam i/Z1",-/f.5 7 " �.�..��,y/ 1if"..,.T,! S <br /> /Y/,r- GK7/ J /� / / J� <br /> P.. �/� �/�/ter /p��-,�,/ 7/a-- <br /> List tests performed: 7-;-s>-r G ��� ,-.7,;;/:.-,-,-...._:- 41/6/ 7 fx SGS 7/ .3---z// <br /> ✓o , ///-2-67SS <br /> • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0 No <br /> • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 No <br /> • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. <br /> To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable <br /> workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. <br /> Signed: Date: <br /> Print Full Name: �,��, ,f , r a,// I.D. No.: 5309. -.5 <br /> White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. <br /> • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 <br />