My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-04-2019 Park Commission Packet
Orono
>
Park Commission
>
Agendas
>
Historical
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
11-04-2019 Park Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2020 1:08:38 PM
Creation date
1/3/2020 1:05:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, September 3, 2019 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Roath asked whether Staff made any changes since the Park Commission last reviewed this. <br />Edwards stated he routinely makes adjustments to the Capital Improvement Plan based on discussions <br />with the Park Commission and the City Council. The CIP is a guideline for how the expenditures would <br />look like going out ten years but is not set in stone. <br />Roath asked whether the matching grant funds are either included in the Park budget or will be allocated <br />from other funds. <br />Edwards indicated that is correct. <br />Carter asked what the average park dedication fees are per year. <br />Edwards indicated it fluctuates based on the number of developments and that he can look at the past ten <br />years to arrive at an average. <br />Johnson stated the Park Fund is being decreased due to the number of projects that have been undertaken <br />and that future funding would be a good topic of discussion at the next work session. <br />Roath asked whether discussing the Park Fund at the next work session would work with the timeline for <br />the overall City budget process. <br />Edwards noted the Capital Improvement Plan is typically finalized by the Council in December. <br />Carter stated the Park Commission is not obligated to spend all that money and that they can prioritize the <br />projects, which may allow the fund to be built back up again. <br />Roath noted of the six projects listed in the memo, the City is moving forward with three of them, and <br />that the document provides an outline to the City Council of what the Park Commission would like to <br />accomplish going into the future. <br />Edwards stated East Long Trail received a grant and design has begun. Summit Beach was included <br />based off of discussions with the Park Commission. The projects on Big Island is tied to a grant and <br />fundraising. The Golf Course fire pit and picnic table at the community garden are just suggestions and <br />no work has been done on those. The Bederwood project has already been accounted for. <br />Roath asked whether Staff could provide a better idea of what is being envisioned for Summit Beach at <br />the October work session, <br />Edwards stated he would like to get the committee together so they can discuss that further. <br />Klaahsen indicated she would be willing to join that committee and that there appears to be a good mix of <br />projects and amenities for 2020. <br />Carter asked whether Staff could also provide how much has been spent on the Capital Improvement <br />Budget over the past ten years. <br />The Park Commission took no formal action on this item. <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.