Laserfiche WebLink
WCC0301 June 4,2004 <br /> Wayzata Country Club Addition/Renovation Page 3 <br /> r7it-D. Detail 6C: This may be subject to interpretation due to the wall "jog"adjacent to the door in this detail, <br /> but it does not appear to meet the 18 inch side clearance required by the MN Accessibility Code. Section <br /> 1341.0442, Subpart 6 requires a door to have no more than an 8 inch recess. <br /> MDA will shift the north bay areas of the room 2"south. This will alter the `jog"to a 7%"recess, therefore meeting <br /> the intent of the code. It will also create a plane difference or a step between the first and second floor, which is <br /> fine. As this is Alternate A2, no further details or modifications will be drawn until the alternate is accepted. <br /> o•kc- E. Details 1D and 1 E: Do these reception desks fall under the requirements of MN Accessibility Code <br /> Section 1341.0720, Subpart 1? If it is believed that they do not, has the City approved this design? Will there be <br /> other"desks"or similar in our scope of work that may need an accessible portion? <br /> These counters do not fall under the noted requirement since they are more a "security"counter than"assistance" <br /> counter. No comment has been made to date with preliminary code reviews by the City. Final code review by the <br /> City is pending. There are no other"desks"in this project, only two bars and two pieces of furniture used as host <br /> stations at the restaurants. <br /> 7. Sheet A330(Typical), also 5D/A650: What are the deflections that we should expect in the new <br /> construction? We like to check w/structural in order to provide the most efficient design of the fire stopping <br /> systems. <br /> Detail 5D/A650 indicates a typical wall joint in plan view. No substantial deflection is expected along wall panels. <br /> A detail similar to this showing the top of a stud wall meeting a precast plank structure should show a slip joint <br /> capable of allowing for 3A"max. vertical movement on this project. MDA to issue typical detail for clarification. <br /> 8. Sheet A331, Detail 2E and 1A/A350: How should the vapor barrier be maintained continuous at this section? <br /> This detail should be modified to show the vapor barrier continuing down past the floor on the south side of the <br /> laminated wood beam and under the 2X10 wood joists, until it connects with the vapor barrier that exists <br /> (hopefully) in the existing north wall of the Pro Shop. Batt insulation will be removed and rigid applied on the <br /> underside of the vapor barrier with plywood, metal lath and stucco finish. MDA to issue detail. <br /> 9. Sheet A380, Details 3D and 6D: Please clarify the extent of vapor barriers and/or waterproof membranes in <br /> these details. Please Note: Detail 2D/A382 indicates a typical detail with a vapor barrier continuous over the <br /> precast. This does not seem to be appropriate for 3D. If a vapor barrier is to be "exposed", does it need to be a <br /> Class I flamespread material? <br /> The vapor barrier at the `floor"level will continue from the roof area under the concrete topping and terminate at <br /> the wall assembly. The concrete topping will be considered more of a "walking"surface than a structural surface. <br /> The detail should be modified to cover waterproof membrane at the wall with gypsum board. This should <br /> eliminate any exposed material in this area. MDA to issue detail. <br /> 10. Sheet A381: <br /> A. Details 5B and 4E indicate that these spaces are vented per 4E/A382 and 5E/A382. Please clarify <br /> venting, insulation, vapor barrier and waterproof membrane. <br /> Modified details will be issued by MDA. <br /> B. Detail 6E: If this floor is a walking surface, should additional protection be provided at the edges or <br /> should the flooring be wider? <br /> The plywood"flooring"should extend to the walls of the "dormer". <br /> 11. Sheet A382: <br /> A. Detail 2B: Should the flashing in this detail be above the standing seam roof such that it will prevent <br /> water from entering beneath the roof system? <br /> Yes. The flashing should be above the standing seam roof, and the building wrap should lap the vertical flashing. <br /> MDA to issue a detail for clarification. <br /> B. Detail 4E: It is not clear to us how venting is achieved. Is attic venting intended? Shall the plywood, <br /> membrane and flashing be held back? If so, how much? <br /> U:\WCC\WCC0301\Documentation\H-Prime Contr\H1 Contractor Correspondence\Document Review.doc <br />