My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
11-25-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2019 4:22:20 PM
Creation date
12/26/2019 4:20:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, November 12, 2019 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Smith to the Luce Line at the end of the street, and don't make the street shorter. If there is talk of a City <br />easement, she would like to see what it looks like. <br />Mr. Doug Whiteley, 60 Orono Orchard Road, said he has never seen an issue that caused an uproar like <br />this other than a proposal to put a cell tower on the Orono Public Golf Course. There is an overwhelming <br />negative response to the proposal. He thinks a permanent easement from Smith Avenue to Luce Line is a <br />very viable solution, but putting one on Orono Orchard Road would be a tragic mistake. He walks to Luce <br />Line 5-6 times a week with his dog, noting as you walk south around the curve from Woodhill Avenue, <br />there's a straightaway and the Luce Line bridge going south, there is a blind spot and you cannot see cars <br />going around the curve. It is dangerous; there's no shoulder and it is not safe. The topography of the <br />proposed easement from Smith Avenue to Orono Orchard is very steep and makes no sense. He agrees <br />with the previous speaker that the cul-de-sac should be by the dead end. He is not opposed to the cul-de- <br />sac but is opposed to the Smith to Orono Orchard Road proposal. He never spoke to T.J. about swapping <br />land. <br />Mr. Sean Benson, 1220 Lyman Avenue, opposes the plan proposed by the Bonnetts. He referenced the <br />Planning Staff's comment that they could not support the proposal unless, among other requests, there is <br />"an inclusion of a trail easement from Smith to the Luce Line." He said this plan does not include that but <br />is an easement that goes to Orono Orchard Road which does not make sense and is also a safety issue. He <br />referenced an email from Mr. Bonnett which stated, "We will maintain the path that is currently available <br />to all neighbors as invitees. This hopefully should not affect anyone too much. The permanent easement <br />cannot be run directly through our property at this point in time as the property line will change if the <br />vacation is granted." He said the plan appears to allow no direct access from Smith to the Luce Line. <br />However, Mr. Bonnett is indicating neighbors can use the current trail but at his discretion. He does not <br />feel that is an appropriate solution because a future property owner could decide not to allow trail access. <br />He wanted to know if a resident of Orono, who doesn't live in the neighborhood, would be prevented <br />from accessing the Luce Line from Smith Avenue. He believes it is better for the City Council to make an <br />explicit decision about allowing community -wide access from Smith directly to the Luce Line. <br />Mr. Benson also questioned the fundamental equity of this plan and said there's a lot of talk about cleanup <br />as though it is normal that residents get free land, which he feels sets a dangerous precedent. He <br />understands the City would give up .66 acres of land with the vacation and the Bonnetts would give up <br />.06 acres of land for the cul-de-sac, so the Bonnetts would receive .6 acres of land at no cost. He does not <br />think it is a benefit for any residents to receive City land at no cost. It also sets an inappropriate precedent <br />for residents to request similar vacations in the future. He would propose an alternative plan whereby the <br />City would move the cul-de-sac north to the end of Smith Avenue, and that way it would lead directly to <br />the DNR -owned trail that leads to the Luce Line. In return for the cul-de-sac, the City could allow the <br />Bonnetts to receive a similarly sized piece of land, .06 acres or something that is equitable. If the Bonnetts <br />do not want to trade property, the City could consider putting in a hammerhead turnaround which should <br />not require any exchange of land. The residents would get the turnaround, direct access from Smith to the <br />Luce Line, the Bonnetts don't have to contend with people on their property, the City does not have to <br />contend with any permanent easements while addressing safety concerns, and it is fair. <br />Mr. Matt Hopping, 95 Smith Avenue, stated as far as traffic, it's UPS trucks and a few strange cars. The <br />path was supposed to go straight to the Luce Line, not to Orono Orchard. If you walk along the ditch, <br />there are culverts with water and other things. It should go straight at the end and the cul-de-sac should be <br />right where the end of the road is now, or a hammerhead. A turnaround is not needed. People back in the <br />driveways. Repave the road and make the road decent because it is a pretty rough road. He does not see <br />Page 7 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.