Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, November 12, 2019 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />parallel to the Luce Line than shortening the street and eliminating the direct access to Luce Line Trail <br />and the DNR property. <br />Mayor Walsh closed the public comment section at 6:52 p.m. <br />Printup thought this winter neighbors might get together and make sure there's some sort of footpath on <br />public property so private property is not touched, nor should it be. The cul-de-sac would be nice and <br />convenient in timing because of the upcoming road project. He said the City could also repave it and <br />leave things as -is and then designate the path going to the Luce Line on City property and there is no <br />private property affected. He would deny the proposal as presented until a plan is brought up to grant the <br />public access to the Luce Line Trail. From a bureaucratic standpoint it sounds kind of small because it <br />should be about vacations and roadways and road improvements, but he is okay with not having a <br />hammerhead or cul-de-sac and leaving the road the way it is after it gets paved. His two takes are to either <br />leave it alone and dedicate a path, or do some sort of improvement but have a dedicated path. <br />Walsh stated the goal for the City is to do the best long-term solution which, in the end, is a cul-de-sac <br />because it's the best way to turn around, although where the cul-de-sac goes is up for debate. The City has <br />direct access and he did not feel the City would give that up. He also would not approve the plan as <br />presented. An option would be to ask the applicant if they would like to table it and come back with a <br />plan based on comments they've heard, and then everyone could see it on paper and then stake it out. The <br />trail through the Bonnetts' land is a very calm, easygoing trail. It would not be the best solution to go <br />through City land because it is so steep, but it could be done. Not everybody is going to be happy. If the <br />City is going to clean things up, they want to come up with the best solution for the citizens long-term. <br />Crosby said it makes sense to have the cul-de-sac at the end of the road and some type of connection from <br />the end of the cul-de-sac to the trail leading to Luce Line. If the Bonnett property's elevation is better for <br />the path, a swap may be a good idea to make it more accessible. He is not in favor of the proposed plan. <br />He agrees a cul-de-sac is going to be needed, but the question is placement. There is a better place, which <br />is down the road. There should be an equitable land swap to make things better for everybody. The <br />neighbors should work together and the applicant should come up with a better proposal from what he is <br />hearing. It can be a win-win for everybody safety -wise and a permanent access to the trail for everyone. <br />He is not an advocate of the trail going to Orono Orchard. <br />Johnson agreed with the previous comments. It would make sense to him to move the cul-de-sac to the <br />end of the street, which removes any question about people's continued rights to gain access to the trail. <br />Historically, the City has done a good job keeping people's access to parks and trails. There may be an <br />opportunity to vacate some of that once the cul-de-sac is in the right spot. The City needs the property <br />owner's cooperation to put a cul-de-sac there, and there has to be something in it for the property owner. <br />There needs to be a good, usable road; and the City will find a way to continue the access people have <br />come to enjoy. The safety side of it is important as far as emergency vehicles. If it was a new <br />development, a cul-de-sac would be put in. It is also reasonable for citizens to see the final plan before it <br />gets approved, so it needs to be brought before the Council. He noted he does not know if putting the cul- <br />de-sac there would create nonconformity with the required setbacks from the houses. <br />Walsh asked if the applicant would like the Council to vote on the plan as proposed or if he would like it <br />tabled and go back to the drawing board a little bit. <br />Page 10 of 17 <br />